• pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    With all due respect, as I understand where this sentiment comes from, that is how Trump gained momentum and won.

    I think the blue no matter who approach has failed more than worked considering Hillary failed, Biden did win but really it was more Trump lost, Kamala lost (she got a shit deal yeah but still neolib vs unchained Trump should have been a no contest) and going further back Gore and Kerry lost to Bush. Clinton basically was the centrist Republican neolib that got Dems a roadmap that they keep to this day.

    The time for half measures is over and the DNC needs to adapt or they will end up like the Whig Party. If you dont believe me look at their approval right now, No one likes the Democrats

    Newsom is an establishment figure and telling the next generation of voters this is going to be a candidate for change won’t yield the results you think.

    • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      With all due respect, as I understand where this sentiment comes from, that is how Trump gained momentum and won.

      Trump gained momentum and won because the people in this country don’t know their ass from their elbow in terms of what is happening, and their whole picture of politics is based on confusion and incredibly effective weaponized propaganda.

      You presented a child with a pretty unappealing fast food burger that had gone cold anyway, and a big lump of shit laced with (and labeled as) rat poison, and then he selected the shit and ate the whole thing. And your reaction is, “Well the burger should have been better.” I mean, it’s not at all an incorrect statement. But I feel like the way it played out should be automatic proof that the burger quality wasn’t the core of the issue.

      • pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        I would say the citizens that experienced the fall out from NAFTA that gutted blue collar jobs and created the rust belt would say “the big lump of shit with rat poison” was the Democrats that threw the working class overboard years ago.

        Speaking of poison, it is the same reason residents of Michigan would rather vote Trump because the Democratic party and Obama would rather gaslight them about their water being safe to drink instead of charging the corporations that cut costs that polluted the water with federal charges. Obama also bailed out Wall Street and left hard working Americans with a shell of an American dream.

        The core of the issue is the Democrats use to be for the everyday man and they lost their way and eroded trust, that will never be gained back. What that leaves voters in fly over states with is a choice to vote their better interest or have a candidate that “tells it like it is” aka lie and get back at the party that screwed them over.

        It’s not as black and white when you’re in the thick of it, as difficult as it is to reason with that base.

        • ExFed@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The greatest trick the devil pulled was convincing people he didn’t exist. The greatest trick the Republican party pulled was convincing people that its most unpopular ideas are entirely Democrats’ fault.

          NAFTA was championed by, majority supported, and voted in by mostly Republicans. It was ultimately bipartisan, but Democrats were significantly more opposed to it than Republicans (of Republican Congress members, only 10 in the Senate and 43 in the House voted against it; of Democrats, 28 in the Senate and 156 in the House voted against it).

          This isn’t to say that NAFTA is objectively bad policy; most economists argue that it ultimately benefited the whole country. However it did expose US manufacturing to significant competition, reduced bargaining power for manufacturing workers, and shocked communities which were solely reliant on the sector to support them. Larger cities were mostly unaffected due to their more diverse economies, and in many cases thrived off increased trade and lower prices for goods. As a reminder, urbanites trend Democrat, rural folk trend Republican.

          The trope that urban liberals successfully screwed over rural conservatives just isn’t true. Instead it seems that, at screwing themselves over, urban liberals failed and rural conservatives succeeded.

          https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1031/vote_103_1_00395.htm https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/1993575

          • pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The greatest trick the Republican party pulled was convincing people that its most unpopular ideas are entirely Democrats’ fault.

            That’s called being politically savvy and out playing your competition which is why the Democratic party is always in free fall.

            All this back and forth leads to this point: The Democrats are not equipped to handle a full assault of our democracy and thinking Gavin Newsom is the guy with some funny parrot tweets is not a real answer.

            • ExFed@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Oh, I’m not saying anything about Newsom, just trying to dispel some sadly common misinformation about NAFTA. I’ve yet to form a solid opinion of the guy, but I’m not without cynical biases, so he’s got an uphill battle to win in my mind.

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            When you don’t have a choice that didn’t back NAFTA then you vote for the ones who are currently saying it sucks. Not the ones pointing to obscure economic indicators and saying everything is fine.

            • ExFed@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Sure. But let’s set the record straight: blue collar jobs in the States didn’t suffer because “Democrat bad and hate workers!” That’s a myth perpetuated by politicians who would manipulate us for their own gain, Republican and Democrat alike.

              In meantime we gotta figure out what to do with a ball of shit filled with rat poison.

              • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                When choosing between more worse and less worse, it makes sense to vote for less worse.

                What’s infuriating is that we can’t vote for better because it doesn’t exist.