It was a sharp rebuke to the prosecutors who are dealing with the fallout from President Trump’s move to send National Guard troops and federal agents into Washington.

  • vegeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    How long until an executive order saying that grand juries are no longer needed for federal cases?

    • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, if Executive Orders can limit your First Amendment Rights (unconstitutional, but who TF cares these days), what are the rest of them even for?

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        As long as you end the EO by saying that everyone will do things according to the law. That way when they follow the instructions and break the law it’s an honest mistake and not the result of the EO.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        2 days ago

        An executive order can say anything. They may not be legal, but that small detail hasn’t stopped Trump as of yet.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do what, murder child sex traffickers in prison to cover their complicity in child sex trafficking?

      • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        They can do whatever they want. On the other hand, the people of the country can throw things other than sandwiches.

        People tend to get confused, even when they are familiar with all these founding documents and principles (which the current government is not). They start to think there are “rules” and they get to say what’s allowed, and they can punish people who do what’s not allowed, but it doesn’t go the other way, because that’s not allowed and they’re in charge. That’s not reality. Reality is, we’re all just on this planet bebopping around, and if someone is in a “government” role, it behooves them to make sure the people “under” them agree with the idea of them being in charge. Because no one has a monopoly on violence or vigor.

        Even the top leaders of the USSR (starting with Kruschev) had to figure this out: He made a mostly unspoken deal with the other leaders that he wouldn’t try to kill them for being potential threats, and in return they wouldn’t kill him to take him out of power and replace him. And what do you know, it worked! It’s better that way. The US up until now has had a little more sophisticated version, extending beyond the inner circle of leadership, but it sounds like Trump is hankering for an earlier era without really being aware of its perils.