• sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s a product. You can buy it or not. If you don’t think it’s worth it, stay away, or stay on the free tier. You’re acting as if you’ve got some kind of right to use a service that’s provided by a commercial entity.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      and it’s a multi-billion dollar corporation, that already makes more money than you or I will ever see in our lifetimes, that actively strives to make the user experience worse for people who don’t pay, when they’ve got a practical monopoly in the “free video sharing platform” market. And you’re whiteknighting for them. 🤡

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        By Darwin you see a lot. I was merely stating that I think YouTube premium is worth the price I pay for it.

        Is there no product you are satisfied with? Your life must be pretty bleak.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        17 hours ago

        more money than you or I will ever see in our lifetimes

        I mean, I feel like you need to expand your comparison a little as the amount that you’ll see in your lifetime is such a minute grain of sand on a beech compared to corporate profits. The money they made today, hell, in the last hour… minute… will dwarf the amount that you will likely see.

      • reev@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 hours ago

        actively strives to make the user experience worse for people who don’t pay

        And evidently those who do! My parents live in a different country. What are they, not my family? What’s the family plan for? (Rhetorical question)

        With Vanced I have so many more options to customize my experience. I can hide shorts I never watch, set a fixed resolution for data and wifi, return the stupid dislike ratio they removed… And if I’m using Vanced anyway to fix all the issues they introduce, why on earth would I additionally pay for their service?

        I want to pay for their shit, especially to support content creators, but I can’t support a platform whose singular mission it is to make everything worse for everyone constantly. Feels like every month I have to get a new extension to undo some horrible design decision.

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        whiteknighting

        was a weak-ass criticism when it was on 4chan being leveled at anyone who said anything not derogatory about a woman, and it’s weak-ass now. Oh no, someone on the internet has an at-least-partially positive opinion of a company, how awful, we’d better stereotype and body-shame them for it.

        If you had your way, the only comments about YouTube - or any other product from a large company - that would be allowed would be negative ones. How the fuck does that make sense?

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’ll join you in the downvotes. There’s many reasons to hate YouTube. Asking them to pay for video content to everyone for free is a bit silly.

      I’m also not saying you shouldn’t use alternatives or run an ad-blocker. Those are cool. I just find it funny how someone is saying: “I get some benefit in paying for this service” results in such backlash, lol.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I know. I thought we were upvoting respectful debate, not having a popularity contest. But apparently not…

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        YouTube steals other people’s work?

        I tend to watch content creators who willingly put their content on YouTube. Am I missing something here…?

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You are missing something. Multiple things actually.

          • most content isn’t uploaded by the copyright holder (e.g. TV excerpts)
          • demonetized videos will still have ads (at least for people without ad blockers)
          • videos are used for machine learning without credit to authors or financial compensation (especially without consent when it’s not the copyright holder uploading them)