Dale@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 个月前With AI being what it is, how long do you think before digital media is no longer admissible in court?message-squaremessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up196arrow-down1message-squareWith AI being what it is, how long do you think before digital media is no longer admissible in court?Dale@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 个月前message-square48fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 个月前Why would the courts need to understand? That is why technical experts are called to support evidence
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-26 个月前 technical experts are called Which are then ignored usually. If courts actually listened to experts we wouldnt have climate change, governments spying on their citizens, countries supporting israels genocide, big tech privacy violations, etc.
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 个月前But courts don’t call on experts in these cases, they are called by the prosecution or defence to support or pick away evidence.
Why would the courts need to understand? That is why technical experts are called to support evidence
Which are then ignored usually. If courts actually listened to experts we wouldnt have climate change, governments spying on their citizens, countries supporting israels genocide, big tech privacy violations, etc.
But courts don’t call on experts in these cases, they are called by the prosecution or defence to support or pick away evidence.