With wealth inequality and billionaire control over American society growing ever more obscene, it’s well past time to implement a maximum wage limit.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is the way you judge what’s wealthy to look at your own situation and target something comfortably above that? There’s plenty of people who will surmise that your situation is comfortably better than theirs once that power is available to the public.

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You don’t have to base it on your own situation, you can base it on cost of living or other objective values.

      There’s a big difference between 1 million and 10 million. With a modest 5% return on investment, 1 million nets you $50,000 per year, which is enough to support a very modest lifestyle in some places (near poverty in others). 10 million with the same investment nets $500,000 per year, which is more than enough to retire to a very luxurious lifestyle and accumulate more wealth along the way.

      And that’s still less than the 14.5 million I proposed, so that person would still not see any wealth tax.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      No it’s based on a ton of actual hard statistics that focus on relative buying power vs what the state supplies. Many Europeans who make less than I do have a higher QoL than I do because their education and healthcare are subsidized/free.