When Sweden and Denmark built a connection between their countries, Sweden preferred a bridge, and Denmark preferred a tunnel, they each built their half and connected them in the middle with an artificial island. The Øresund Bridge is unique in the world.

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s one in Virginia, the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel. There are two tunnels segments to go under major shipping channels. There are major naval bases upstream, and it was considered a national security risk to have a fleet potential trapped behind a downed bridge.

      • ray@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge is another one. It’s a bridge most of the way but there’s one section that’s a tunnel.

      • prettybunnys@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Driving over from Hampton into Norfolk and seeing the carriers at dock is pretty cool.

        Makes them look tiny relative to how large they actually are.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s nothing. There’s a magic farmer near me. His tractor turns into a field.

  • toofpic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not like Denmark “preferred” a tunnel, it’s just there is an island and waters are shallow, so they didn’t need to go all-out “hammer supports in the sea”

    • goldenbug@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      IIRC the Island is artificial and the reason a tunnel was made was because the entry point would be too close to the airport, endangering the airport and the bridge.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    The justification for the additional expenditure and complexity related to digging a tunnel for part of the way, rather than raising that section of the bridge, was to avoid interfering with air traffic from the nearby Copenhagen Airport, to provide a clear channel for ships in good weather or bad, and to prevent ice floes from blocking the strait. The bridge received the 2002 IABSE Outstanding Structure Award.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

    There’s been a bridge/tunnel in Virginia since the 60’s, crossing the mouth of the Chesapeake bay where it opens to the Atlantic.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or maybe it was expensive but recouped huge amounts due to enabling travel between the two countries, which facilitates all kinds of economic activity

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Funnily enough it’s expected to fully pay back the cost it took to build via user fees, and it was financed by loans. Which means taxes weren’t even used for this. And that’s not even mentioning the indirect benefits the two countries had