Huh don’t recall this. Was it a big deal at the time?
Also from Amazon description:
Courts: The authors have insider knowledge of how Obama will pack the Supreme Court and lower courts with activist judges who will overstep their constitutional authority.
Lol.
iTs a rEpUbLiC nOt a dEmoCraCy.
There’s a reason why they keep saying that recently, they don’t want democracy. They want to backflip themselves into selecting how leaders are chosen and who gets to choose.
Previous discussions have informed me that at a certain point of wealth, you no longer consider yourself part of the “black class” and you instead consider yourself part of the “wealthy class”.
In other news, everything GOP presidents do is official and everything DEM presidents do is private.
You really didn’t, you went to other cases. And not just the supreme Court bit, all the way down on this case (overturning election case).
But I see you’re not going to admit it.
If you come in with grand claims about this case (overturning election case), then you better be prepared to back that up for this case (overturning election case).
Really doesn’t change that you were going on about this case (overturning election case) being maga all the way down, while Cannon is on a different case (documents case).
So how is this case (overturning the election) maga all the way down? I’ve not read up on it and if you can fill us in that’d be great.
The court analyzed four categories of conduct contained in Trump’s indictment: his discussions with Justice Department officials following the 2020 election, his alleged pressure on then-Vice President Mike Pence to block certification of Biden’s election win, his alleged role in assembling fake pro-Trump electors and his conduct related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The court found Trump was absolutely immune for conversations with Justice Department officials but returned the case to lower courts to determine whether Trump has immunity for the other three categories.
The ruling marked the first time since the nation’s 18th century founding that the Supreme Court has declared that former presidents may be shielded from criminal charges in any instance.
I didn’t even have to open that to see that’s the documents case. This post was about immunity for trying to overturn the election. Different cases.
I have not, can you fill us in?
The most extremely extreme xetreme conditions, if you need.
What killed the mall:
It was an experiment on the 3rd place (read up on it) and it failed at that.
Big box retailers wanted big, huge, gigantic stores. So they left malls to open them.
Being surrounded by parking structures doesn’t look appealing.
High rent for mall space.
Amazon.
*Other entertainment options are much better now with streaming tv, video games, etc.
Just saw a video from him and my God he’s bought into the great war thing.
I think most people would reserve the word terrifying for extreme conditions.
There’s terrifying (or should I say scared) and then there’s terrifying.
Well yes. You have hurricanes of different intensity. Some are just a little more than a bad storm.
I thought we decided FAANGM was better as FAGMAN.
And sizzling is good.
Afaik water pressure is variable based on each city’s design needs.
To actually understand you’d have to have been following politics pre 9/11, which would make you probably 16 at the time. That means 39 right now. That’s a lot of adults you’re ruling out.
If you want to say understand society pre and post 9/11, then you’re probably talking 12 at the time, so 35 right now. Still a lot of adults you’re ruling out.