Since Trump’s election, gun groups catering to progressives and people of color report a surge in interest as they look to defend themselves in a country that, to them, feels increasingly unstable.

  • JesusSon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Unless you plan to carry concealed or get a concealed carry license skip the pistol for your first gun.

    If you want something for home defense that sits by the bed get a 20-gauge pump shotgun. I’ve never met anyone man woman or child that couldn’t shoot one and #3 or #4 buckshot is hard to miss with within 20 or 30 yards. You can go to almost any sporting goods store and pick one up for about $250. I like the Maverick 88.

    If you want something to hunt with or just have in case of “troubles” get yourself a decent bolt-action rifle with a 3x9 scope in a popular caliber such as 308 or 270. Rifles are easier to shoot and you can use them for hunting. Once you shoot the rifle a few times and are comfortable with it you can put it away for those “troubles.”

    If the US gets ripe enough you need to stack bodies you are going to want a rifle more than a pistol and if you have a shotgun or a rifle you can pick up a pistol, there will be plenty on those bodies you are stacking.

    That’s my extremely qualified opinion, but with that said opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.

    Good luck out there, be safe.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      As someone with many years experience, I second this and highly recommend shotguns for home defense.

      If you’re ready to move up to mobile defense for whatever reasons, and you’re not someone who dedicates time and money to shooting regularly, I recommend a revolver like a .38, they are simple to operate, accurate, reliable in almost any conditions, almost impossible to jam, easy to see if it’s loaded and ready to fire, and generally much easier to manage and maintain than an automatic.

      Very few times in all recorded personal defense situations has anyone ever had to reload, and most of these incidents are over after just a couple rounds are fired. (It’s amazing how people with bad intentions tend to forget about their grievances after just one hole, two will usually do the trick no matter where said holes are.)

      I also highly recommend anyone who takes any of this remotely seriously to take some self-defense classes, any kind of martial art, don’t get sucked down any kind of pipeline of people screaming about what style is best for what, literally anything that gets you able to use your arms and legs as defense tools. You desperately need that muscle memory so your first line of defense isn’t the deadly weapon, and so you can survive if you lose your weapon for whatever reason, and not get mentally hung up on having a gun always.

    • pentastarm@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I bought my first gun, a shotgun, two month ago for home defense. I also got some of these home defense rounds, it looks like little plates stacked up inside the shell. I guess they aren’t supposed to penatrate drywall, so they are safer to use inside a house to reduce accidental or unintentional injuries.

    • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you have the money just get an AR 15. There is a reason it’s so popular.

      There could be a world ending apocalypse and you’ll still find parts and ammo. And it’s an incredibly well rounded platform that’s pretty easy to use.

        • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Ignoring that a shotgun isnt nearly as useful and will rounded, yes, shotguns in general are not as ubiquitous or popular.

          In 2021, 21,037,810 total firearms were available for the U.S. market, which includes firearms that were domestically produced plus those imported—minus exported firearms. Of those, 12,799,067 were handguns, 4,832,198 were rifles and 3,406,545 were shotguns.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I mean that is great but im betting a large majority of shotguns are 12 gauge and use very similar parts and a less percentage of rifles are ar15. Also shotguns are about the simplest gun designs.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Also, the US Military used 5.56 ammo, so if things really go down, you know there’s a supply. Fair note: you can shoot 2.23 ammo with a 5.56 rifle, but you don’t want to put 5.56 in a 2.23.

        • JesusSon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          .223 or 223

          2.23 is not a thing 5.56 is the metric measurement of .224 diameter bullets which are used in both 5.56x45mm and .223.

          To go deeper, a civilian .223 Remington is almost identical to the military 5.56x45mm. Both use a bullet diameter of .224 and a weight between 40 grains and 77 grains. The differences without getting super technical are in SAAMI pressures. A .223 Remington cartridge produces less pressure than the military 5.56x45mm. You can shoot both out of a rifle marked 5.56x55mm or .223 Wylde but it is not recommended that you shoot 5.56x45mm in a rifle marked .223 Remington.

          .223 Remington (SAAMI MAP): 55,000 psi (≈379.2 MPa) maximum average pressure (piezo).

          5.56×45 mm NATO (NATO/EPVAT service pressure): ≈ 62,366 psi (≈ 430 MPa) service pressure (piezo).

          • credo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Since we’re having fun, the other difference between .223 and 5.56 is the throat length, with 5.56 being longer. Wylde not only supports the higher pressure, but also splits the difference in the chamber to account for the difference in throats.

            I.e., a .223 Wylde chamber has a longer throat than a .223 Remington chamber, but a shorter one than a 5.56 NATO chamber, which allows it to accurately fire both .223 Remington and 5.56 NATO ammunition.

            I’ve been told shooting .223 in a 5.56 will wear out the chamber faster… but haven’t exactly tested that.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        5.56 rounds over penetrates less than 9mm and less than many different shot shells too. I like HD 9mm rounds but the AR platform for home defense is a smart choice.

        • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          And I’m not saying it’s ideal, but you’ll still take a deer down in some insane scenario where you’re hunting for food.

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Ive heard even 9mm higher pressure rounds through a carbine length barrel can stop some bears. Im not saying I’d trust it to be my first choice in that situation but I’d wager if you get good enough with 5.56 there’s not much you wouldn’t be able to stop with a couple follow up shots or hunt with a good first shot.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      When I thought about buying a shotgun I looked into rock salt and other non lethal ammo, it turns out it’s illegal to load shells with rock salt. Hard to believe

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          actually im southern Italian/Lebanese so my skin is tanned and have been in trouble with the police before. Stop making everything about race.

          • theparadox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Because in numerous cases, the cops have attacked the victims when responding to a call. If you are a minority it’s even more likely. Combine that with a white attacker, even more likely.

            • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              oh never seen that before that much, ive seen some cops do some stupid shit, but it doesnt seem like a widespread issue.

              • theparadox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Are you familiar with the expression “[the thin blue line](Are you familiar with the expression “the thin blue line” and mindset that it reinforces?)” and the mindset that it reinforces?
                Are you familiar with the “warrior” training so many police go through, where they are trained to see threats from everywhere and to prioritize their own lives above others?
                Are you aware that, legally, cops aren’t obligated to protect you if you aren’t in their custody?
                Did you see the footage from the Uvalde school shooting?
                All of these combine together to result in so many instances of police escalating tense situations instead of de-escalating those situations. It results in police shooting innocent people because they thought they saw a gun. Like I said, if you are a minority things tend to be much worse. You’re likely guilty of something in their eyes, even if the cop is a minority.

          • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Big difference between having cops, and having cops that you can trust to protect you.

            Also, even if for argument’s sake we assume that the police will act in your best interest when they show up, not everyone lives in a large city where you’re never more than five minutes away from a cop. The US is huge, and the vast majority of it is rural and isolated. If you live in one of those places help from police might be hours away rather than minutes. You’re on your own until they show up. If they show up at all.

      • Xella@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        You’re very fortunate. I live in a place in the US where it’s a toss up on whether the cops will even show up. I’ve called an ambulance for it to never show up before. Unfortunately we’re on our own and have to take matters into our own hands if we expect to survive. Guns are a plague but there’s not much that can be done at this point. We must protect our families.

        • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Following up on your comment, there’s plenty of places in the US where you don’t call the cops as a non-white person at all; since the cops have gone out and shot the brown person that called them… since you know, the cops commonly assume the brown person is the perpetrator.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I disagree on a shotgun for HD, pistols are more manueverable, easier to go through doorways, and harder to disarm. The only caveat is normal pistol rounds will over penetrate furthet than bird shot, but other types of shot can over penetrate as much as 9mm. 5.56 rounds actually overpentrate less than 9mm and some people use AR pistols, or full sized ARs, for HD because of this. You don’t want bullets flying through walls you can’t see through, and Id highly recommend agaist anything pump action especially for someone who isnt going to practice cycling the weapon.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        For most people a shotgun for HD is the way to go.

        For someone that knows a thing or two, I agree with you… pistol or SBR… I just don’t think that’s most people.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Most people who buy shotguns are gonna end up with a pump shotgun and that’s a big downside for anyone whos not practicing cycling the weapon because in terms of stopping power follow up shots outclass bigger bullet every time. A pump action is setting up beginners to fail at following up more than any other common HD weapon. Most semi auto shotguns cost at least double what pumps do and are more expensive than comprable pistols and even solid budget rifles. I stand by my recommendations, if someone really wants a shotgun and they’re new, insist on a semi auto, but that’s the minority.

      • Ancalagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This! The over penetration is why Shotgun is better especially for more dense areas such as apartments.