• ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Steam is the very, very rare case of a major company that is both not beholden to shareholders, and has a pretty good guy at the helm.

    • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I simply do not understand the sentiment that not being a total bastard is something celebrated and not expected or required.

      And while many like our Steam benevolent (almost) monopoly, I do wonder how would the market look like if we had 20 competing companies that cannot gain more than 5% of the market share. Can you imagine the competition between them and how would that benefit us, the consumer?

      • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        That would mean exclusives everywhere. Everyone would try to force some game pass on us, until our only choice to get an OK selection would be having 4 subscriptions. Or piracy.

        With Steam, I get a well integrated platform for buying, updating and launching everything with the correct compatibility layer.

        That’s more convenient than piracy, so I use it.

      • offspec@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        “Not being a total bastard” is a weird way to describe overhauling the gaming on linux experience at no additional cost to the end user, among many other incredibly pro consumer choices they’ve pushed in the last twenty odd years.