• hera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not in the way that LLMs use them though. People used them in personal conversation, but not in documents and articles etc

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          In GitHub documentation, it has. It used to give repos a more polished look before it became an LLM signature.

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              That would be some context about your thinking that it would have made sense to include in your first comment, given the thread context!

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I broadly agree, but we’ve got to take context into account. It seems extremely unlikely to me that OP is using an LLM here:

      • The post body is short and to the point;
      • OP’s post history looks plausibly human to me;
      • lemmy is a small platform that doesn’t tend to have LLM slop;
      • The topic isn’t one I associate with LLM bots (if OP was trying to sell us on something, for example, I’d be more dubious).

      Sometimes it’s wise to give someone the benefit of the doubt

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What about the Post history looks plausibly human? Six hour old account, no comments, and five posts. Nothing about that looks plausible human. Not necessarily has to be a bot, but clearly nothing about that indicates a person.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I hadn’t noticed how new the account was, which definitely does weaken this point as evidence towards being a human, but aside from that, there isn’t anything particular that sets off alarm bells for me; their posts are primarily concerning recent news, but they’re not overly focussed on any particular news topic.

          With the advent of LLMs, I’ve found that there’s a spectrum of spam-posting: a more conventional bot account tends to have a high volume of posting, and you can usually see there’s a particular angle they’re pushing due to all or the majority of posts concerning a particular topic or issue; some accounts that read as less “botty” may have a human controlling what’s being posted, but using an LLM for the content of the posts or comments. Those are the two main archetypes I tend to see, but like I say, it’s a spectrum. OP doesn’t have a high posting volume, and the body of each post is quite small; there doesn’t seem to be any particular purpose to the account — it seems more plausible to me that this is just a human using emojis occasionally.

          I suspect I’m somewhat biased here; LLM generated text tends to be heavy on both em-dashes and semicolons, both of which I chronically overuse. I sympathise with people who are wary of potentially LLM generated content, but I worry about the risk of this wariness becoming excessive hypervigilance