tmpod@lemmy.pt to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoFirefox 145.0www.firefox.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkFirefox 145.0www.firefox.comtmpod@lemmy.pt to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareDarkenfolk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoUntil it’s not, which Is the biggest problem that I have with so called “link aggregators”. What is the use of a decentralized network of communities if all the material can still be nuked from outside?
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months ago Until it’s not How relevant are Firefox release notes after the subsequent release? That’s one resource I don’t mind not being archived.
minus-squareDarkenfolk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoMeant more in general. But yeah for release notes of an opensource product it might not be directly necessary.
Until it’s not, which Is the biggest problem that I have with so called “link aggregators”.
What is the use of a decentralized network of communities if all the material can still be nuked from outside?
How relevant are Firefox release notes after the subsequent release? That’s one resource I don’t mind not being archived.
Meant more in general. But yeah for release notes of an opensource product it might not be directly necessary.