- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
- technology@lemmy.ml
- firefox@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- linux@lemmy.ml
- technology@lemmy.ml
- firefox@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
The loss of support for 32 bit Linux systems feels like a bit of a concern, use of older hardware just for web browsing is no longer possible.
Yup, i personally own various 32 bit machines that are completely usable in daily driving but the steady decline of supported programs to run on them is forcing them into more “retro computing” roles. Honestly, its a shame…
For what it’s worth, Pale Moon can still be built for 32-bit Linux ( fish through contributed builds, or build your own). Sufficient for many, many sites, although a few will break or require workarounds.
Still no HDR.
Exactly what I was looking for in the update… mad that it still isn’t in
On the one hand, the PDF editing feature could be useful, but on the other, it’s a sign of yet more feature creep and I don’t know whether I’m justified in feeling concerned about it.
Downvoted for not giving any sort of summary of the larger features and fixes
Can you not just click and read the web page? It seems to be all there.
Until it’s not, which Is the biggest problem that I have with so called “link aggregators”.
What is the use of a decentralized network of communities if all the material can still be nuked from outside?
Until it’s not
How relevant are Firefox release notes after the subsequent release? That’s one resource I don’t mind not being archived.
Meant more in general. But yeah for release notes of an opensource product it might not be directly necessary.
The Firefox browser itself tells me there is an update. An update could be interesting to read about here and if so I think it makes sense to make the case with the highlights. Like, why did you find it interesting enough to put here?
Personally, I’m pretty inclined to downvote any post that is a link without a short summary or context. I appreciate that’s not everyone.
And personally I think it’s important to say why you downvote. The poster can choose what to do with that information and I’ve got no expectations for them to change how they do things
I’m pretty inclined to downvote any post that is a link without a short summary or context.
Why? The summary of Firefox release notes is the Firefox release notes.
I agree there should be a summary for other things, esp. videos or long articles, but for release notes, they’re already generally in a condensed format. This one is a few pictures with a couple sentences explaining what’s new in them.
