• FatCrab@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What is described in the second point is literally how Design Patent claims work. They don’t work the same way as utility patents. Anyway, yea, people not knowing how patents actually work aside, leadership at the USPTO is currently fucked.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      The point is that design patents are fucking stupid and should not exist in the first place.

      Apple has sued other phone manufacturers over them making a rectangle with rounded corners.

      And it’s fucked.

      • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Design patents effectively work like brand protection. They literally only protect new aesthetics and ornamentation. The reality is that the iPhone did start the trend of rounded corner rectangular touchscreen phones. When it first came out, it was a fairly novel form factor for a phone. It didn’t prevent other form factors from being released. Like, the fact that it is now so ubiquitous that we take for granted smartphones look this way is a testament to its success. And, actually, plenty of phones did right angle screen corners. Design Patents are extraordinarily narrow things and, among the many issues with the current USPTO and the US IP system in general, it is probably the absolutely least problematic piece.

        • Devial@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          “They’re extradonarily narrow” whilst literally talking about an apple patent that covers ANY type of digital display device whatsoever that has rounded corners.

          That’s not even close to “extremely narrow” in scope.