SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoDude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anywaylemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square296fedilinkarrow-up1326arrow-down1103
arrow-up1223arrow-down1imageDude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anywaylemmy.dbzer0.comSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square296fedilink
minus-squareGebruikersnaam@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down3·7 hours agoA female woman? In this economy? To me it’s a sign that someone is not really used to communicating with people irl or that they are trans-exlusionary. Both are a red flag…
minus-squarestarelfsc2@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoI understand what you mean but “not used to communicating with people irl” being a red flag is kinda sad. Some people are just not good at socializing or don’t have many friends while also not being a bad person.
minus-squareknow_your_place@eviltoast.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·4 hours agoIt’s literally language. If you use it as an adjective, it is literally how it’s meant to be used: “A female coworker” ✅ “A co-worker who is a woman” ✅ “A woman coworker” ⛔ “A co-worker who is a female” ⛔ You’re just a misandrist masquerading as a feminist.
A female woman? In this economy?
To me it’s a sign that someone is not really used to communicating with people irl or that they are trans-exlusionary. Both are a red flag…
I understand what you mean but “not used to communicating with people irl” being a red flag is kinda sad. Some people are just not good at socializing or don’t have many friends while also not being a bad person.
It’s literally language. If you use it as an adjective, it is literally how it’s meant to be used:
“A female coworker” ✅ “A co-worker who is a woman” ✅ “A woman coworker” ⛔ “A co-worker who is a female” ⛔
You’re just a misandrist masquerading as a feminist.