I have no airtravel experience, but I would assume that it falls in the first category.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The best ones don’t bother, because collecting fares is expensive and slows everything down

    You can have self funded infrastructure, it can work, but it just seems like a bad solution. It’s a weakness. All it takes is one leader throwing a wrench in the process, and the whole thing unbalances and you get a death spiral

    But if it’s free? Even if maintenance is neglected for a time, there’s no feedback loop

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      All it takes is one leader throwing a wrench in the process

      Btw self funded insulates from that. You can have a committee run it and it blocks a lot of the politics from mattering for it

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The best ones don’t bother, because collecting fares is expensive and slows everything down

      That’s simply untrue. the best public transit system on earth collects fees, and no, it doesn’t slow things down any significant level because it’s just tapping as you walk by

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s a schedule that includes buses… You’re going to have the odd person who either isn’t ready, doesn’t have enough on their account, or doesn’t understand the system, and each one knocks the schedule off by 20-40 seconds. You’ve also got lines at the machines, you’ve got overhead to track all this… None of that is free, especially not the man hours

        I’ve used really really great paid public transport… It just does not compare to when it’s also free. More people use it, people act less entitled, it’s just a better experience