Why the reporter won’t say “so you had no problem giving 40 billion to Argentina to bail out out your friend, but you didn’t know how to use the 6 billions to not let over 40 million Americans including 16 million children starve?”
Well, I think the point isn’t to discern whether or not he’s fine with fucking over kids (obviously he is), it’s to make that clear to as many people as possible
Because that question has 4 numbers in it, which is too confusing for the average viewer. But yes, the $40 billion dollars Trump g®ifted to Argentina would have kept SNAP completely funded for 5 months.
Why the reporter won’t say “so you had no problem giving 40 billion to Argentina to bail out out your friend, but you didn’t know how to use the 6 billions to not let over 40 million Americans including 16 million children starve?”
You mean the guy who protects kid fuckers is fine with fucking over kids? Nahh
Well, I think the point isn’t to discern whether or not he’s fine with fucking over kids (obviously he is), it’s to make that clear to as many people as possible
Because that question has 4 numbers in it, which is too confusing for the average viewer. But yes, the $40 billion dollars Trump g®ifted to Argentina would have kept SNAP completely funded for 5 months.