• 4 Posts
  • 412 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: 12 August 2024

help-circle



  • I know cars really don’t need more complexity, but I am surprised we haven’t implemented a function that if there is a pump pumping gas into the tank that the car won’t turn on the first time but rather alert you something is in the tank. Maybe make it so it only warns the first time, and then if you try to start it a second time it will start so if your gas cap has an issue you can still go get a new gas cap, but I have seen many a tired person on road trips accidentally turn the car on while pumping gas.

    That said, the amount of other cars that get started next to you pumping gas and fires don’t start seems to indicate the chance of a fire starting from a car being started must be low. Like it can’t be uncommon for the distance between your pumping gas fumes and the car engine on the other side of the pump is about as close as the engine of your actual vehicle.















  • Because what you quoted is an opinion based on an action not being taken. Also the vote was already called for but has not yet taken place. Where as there was an action of subterfuge stated here “Multiple sources have told her that “a top Democratic HFAC staffer … deliberately inflated projections of opposition to the bipartisan measure – warning of 20 to 40 Democratic defections” in a bid to indicate the resolution would fail overwhelmingly.”

    Neither Jefferies or Schumer are HFAC staff members. Those members are designated regions of the world. One “Top” member presides over the Middle East and North Africa.

    I thought it was Sheila but I need to correct that, she apparently stepped down in November after an indictment, it is now held by Brad Sherman, a Representative in California.


  • So if I read that right it would possibly mean Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, a representative from Florida may be the one being manipulated or doing the manipulation.

    The darker side of the article seems to state several Democrats agree that attacking Iran would be a political catastrophe so if Trump did it, it may assist in regaining hold of either the Senate or the House so they would have the numbers to potentially stop future issues.

    Dark Because the sacrifices that are brought to the table, but in truth… they aren’t the ones who put them on the table.

    Basically, do we have the numbers to stop this? No. So should we allow it to fail spectacularly to use it to our advantage? Maybe.

    Every life lost was chosen by the White Houses actions, it’s crazy that representatives have to even debate how us peasants may or may not benefit by their deaths.