Democratic activists are looking to overhaul the party’s presidential primary process with ranked-choice voting.

Proponents of the idea have privately met with Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin and other leading party officials who want to see ranked-choice voting in action for 2028. Those behind the push include Representative Jamie Raskin, the nonprofit Fairvote Action, and Joe Biden pollster Celinda Lake.

Axios reports that ranked-choice supporters told a DNC breakfast meeting in D.C. that they believe it would unify and strengthen the party, prevent votes from being “wasted” after candidates withdraw, and encourage candidates to build coalitions. The publication quotes DNC members as being divided on the issue, with some being open and others thinking that it is best left to state parties.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I just want to point out that Ranked-Choice Voting was on the ballot in Colorado in 2024. It ultimately failed because it was opposed by both parties. I was surprised, because I talked through the issues with a friend who considered herself “very progressive” she mentioned she was against Ranked-Choice Voting because her Democratic Voting Guide recommended voting against it.

    From https://tsscolorado.com/colorado-voters-easily-reject-ranked-choice-voting/

    …it angered both Democratic and Republican party leaders and drew opposition from prominent Democratic backers, including a plethora of unions, progressive groups and some environmental organizations.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If you blindly follow a Democratic Voting Guide, you’re not “very progressive.” Probably not even “kind of progressive.”

    • punkideas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It was combined with a top 4 jungle primary that was not ranked choice, which was why a lot of people who might have voted for it otherwise voted against it. It looked like a way to implement ranked choice while creating a system where less moderate candidates would be eliminated in the primary.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The problem with the two party system, is the only thing they’ll always agree on is that it should remain a two party system.

      We had the same issue in the UK. We had the choice of something else and it was dismissed as “too complicated” and “too expensive”.

      So instead most of us have their votes thrown out locally, and then most of the rest have them thrown out nationally.

    • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It has already passed in Alexandria VA for the 2024 elections and the DNC sued to prevent it from being implemented. They kept rcv option off the ballot in DC.

      Even if it were implemented across the country no capitalist politician would be ranked on my ballot

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ohio passed a law this year banning state funds to any municipality that implemented ranked choise voting. Only one or two representatives voted against it. The only bi-partisan bill they passed thos year

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Following a democratic voting guide has got to be the least progressive you can be as a Democrat

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This shouldn’t be that surprising, RCV will completely topple the establishment politics apple cart. When people are no longer forced to choose between the lesser of two evils, they can instead choose someone who’s a halfway decent human being who will represent them instead of corpo pac donors. It would be absolutely transformative to roll this out nationally.