• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Can somebody explain to me how it’s supposedly “logical”?

    We haven’t achieved “fully automated” on Earth for as mundane tasks as picking vegetables. What makes you think space travel would make full automation possible?

    • belluck@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      This is a Star Treck meme.
      Human society in Star Treck is pretty close to Utopia. All their material needs are met. Money has been abolished. Jobs only serve the purpose of self-fulfillment.
      The sentence „fully automated luxury space communism“ is a reference to this meme, even if it doesn’t fit 100%.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t need luxury, I want gay space communism!

      Also the gay is implied anyway - look at the top of the star (in that fantastic logo) how it’s not aligned straight.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure there’s a single syllable that fits the whole plus so I guess you drop it and kind force inclusion by implying it Like gods vs gods and goddesses, goddesses are already gods

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        goddesses are already gods

        That’s called invisibilization of women. The French language, which is my mother tongue, does that a lot, and we’re fighting against that.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve heard arguments for the opposite: women who act should be called actors, not actresses, the logic being that the -ess suffix is diminutive, so all actors should just be actors. It seems like there are perfectly reasonable arguments to be made for either side.

          • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It may be possible in English, I’m not competent enough to have a strong opinion.

            In French, as all words are gendered, the things are different.

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    when I want the full luxury gay space communism scifi experience I go and reread “Consider Plebas” from Ian M Banks’s Culture series

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      But also Ferengi and lots of other mercantile civilizations, and we also see the individual crew members taking part in the trade/monetary economy. It’s kinda the Federation, and more specifically its government, that doesn’t deal use money.

      And that’s because it projects influence through military might and soft power. It doesn’t need money.