• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think the issue is Linux users think user friendly means 100% freedom to adjust and configure as desired (the system is friendly to users), and most other people think user friendly means a single obvious green path to getting things done.

    These are not strictly incompatible, they’re just difficult to balance.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think KDE does it well? “simple by default, powerful when needed” works a charm on their applications

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        KDE was a nightmare for my wife since it has the configuration right in the desktop bars and dialogs. Misclicks and drags meant she was making changes she didn’t want to. GNOME was a better choice, 100% simple and no surprises.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s stupid. We do not design cars such that it’s impossible to crash if someone starts yanking on the wheel randomly.

          Expecting an OS to do as much is … just beyond pathetic.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Except GNOME did exactly that. Sh can’t accidentally alter anything. Some people just have a hard time with computers and expected UI. Ever tried watching a good grampa deal with printer install and windows popups…you have to simplify things for less tch savvy people. Just like cars now have auto ebrake and lane assist

    • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Let’s not kid ourselves. Anybody who thinks that Linux is as user-friendly to the average user as eg. Windows or macOS is completely out of touch with how helpless the average user is

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        When I was college back in 2009 I was dual booting Ubuntu and Windows Vista on a gateway laptop. I never fiddled with Ubuntu at all. The things that worked out of the box worked reliability and I never bothered fighting with things that didn’t work like the stylus.

        The reason why I didn’t make the switch back then was not the OS or the drivers. It was the lack of support for the software I needed for school, like Matlab and orcad pspice. Things have improved substantially since then between first party support (Matlab started supporting Linux with R2016a) and wine/proton letting windows applications run mostly normally without their developers needing to make any changes to support the OS.

        IMO the thing that’s most in the way of adoption these days is the lack of mainstream OEM support. Until the masses can easily buy a computer with Linux pre-installed and the driver niggles sorted they’re not going to switch.