Fleur_@aussie.zone to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 4 days agoYou always have to analyse a person's internet post about themselves or their life the same way you read a book written with an unreliable narratormessage-squaremessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down13
arrow-up1130arrow-down1message-squareYou always have to analyse a person's internet post about themselves or their life the same way you read a book written with an unreliable narratorFleur_@aussie.zone to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squarePierceTheBubble@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 days agoSo with a healthy amount of skepticism? I agree, but would argue this extends to “reliable” sources too. Just because an author has established a trustworthy track record for themselves, doesn’t mean one should become less critical of the writings.
So with a healthy amount of skepticism? I agree, but would argue this extends to “reliable” sources too. Just because an author has established a trustworthy track record for themselves, doesn’t mean one should become less critical of the writings.