return2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoGermany, other NATO allies sending troops to Greenland amid Trump threatswww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1463arrow-down14cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1459arrow-down1external-linkGermany, other NATO allies sending troops to Greenland amid Trump threatswww.newsweek.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square100fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squareFerrous@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoThe Steele dossier was a fake.
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoUnverified? Yes. Corroborating of what we know? Also yes. Proven fake? Definitely not.
minus-squareFerrous@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day ago Proven fake? Definitely not. Thats not how the burden of proof works. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoAd Ignorantiam fallacy states otherwise. Also, circular-reasoning fallacy: Who says they’re extraordinary claims within the context of what we already know?
minus-squareFerrous@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day ago Ad Ignorantiam fallacy states otherwise. What does this even mean?
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoAh, and therein lies the problem ladies & gentlemen.
The Steele dossier was a fake.
Unverified? Yes. Corroborating of what we know? Also yes.
Proven fake? Definitely not.
Thats not how the burden of proof works. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Ad Ignorantiam fallacy states otherwise.
Also, circular-reasoning fallacy: Who says they’re extraordinary claims within the context of what we already know?
What does this even mean?
Ah, and therein lies the problem ladies & gentlemen.