The U.S. government is shelling out a whopping $2.7 billion to three companies in an effort to strengthen domestic uranium enrichment, amid surging electricity demand from AI data centers.

The Department of Energy announced on Monday that it will award $900 million each to American Centrifuge Operating and Orano Federal Services, as well as General Matter, a nuclear startup backed by billionaire investor Peter Thiel.

The funding will be distributed through task orders over the next 10 years, under what the department described as a “strict milestone approach.”

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    That ship has sailed. With renewables and storage nuclear makes no financial sense and dispatchable power doesn’t work well with base load generation.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Storage costs balloon when you go full renewable, because instead of just storing enough for the night, you need to charge up enough during the summer to last the winter since solar power dries up.

      Having a constant 20% of power nuclear would decrease the need to make a huge amount of batteries, since you can serve the demand on a lower amount of sunlight.

      But what about wind? It works in places that are windy and have space for it, and America doesn’t have super high voltage transmission to cover every area.

      You just can’t connect everything to shore up needs of every area because the country is too big and we forgot how to build things

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        You just can’t connect everything to shore up needs of every area because the country is too big and we forgot how to build things

        It’s called HVDC, it’s been in use for decades. Just admit you like nuclear because reasons and we’ll call it a day.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s not going to support 100% renewable usage. It is not built to transfer solar power from Nevada to Minnesota

          Everything works better when you have baseline nuclear power, transmission losses decrease, storage costs decrease, coal and gas get phased out. Remember that batteries need to be replaced often and they are very much not green. Nuclear plants operate on the scale of decades before getting replaced.

          Those are the reasons I like nuclear.

          • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            It is not built to transfer solar power from Nevada to Minnesota

            This exists and is longer than that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Madeira_HVDC_system

            Everything works better when you have baseline nuclear power

            Nope. Baseline isn’t helpful when you’r dealing with dispatchable generation, I already mentioned this.

            Remember that batteries need to be replaced often and they are very much not green.

            Nope. I already mentioned that silicon ion is capable of thousands of charge cycles.

            they are very much not green.

            Nope. Not when you’re comparing it to the amount of concrete in a nuclear plant.

            Like every other pro-nuclear person it’s all about feels with you. I’ve given you plenty of evidence, which you’ve rejected much like a cultist would do. I see no point continuing to discuss this with someone who has made an emotional decision to support nuclear in the face of all the evidence.