Arturo Gamboa, the man shot in June while openly carrying a rifle at Salt Lake City’s No Kings protest…
Looking to confront Gamboa for his AR-15-style firearm, a safety volunteer fired three shots. Two struck him, and another killed an innocent bystander…
When asked about his actions that day, Gamboa said he was “peacefully protesting, utilizing my First and Second Amendment rights under the Constitution.”…
How about shooting an innocent bystander and the armed protester while he was carrying a rifle.
They would have thought twice about shooting Arturo if he had a dozen armed friends nearby, I’d wager.
example of you being wrong
So…
That means you couldnt find an example of what I was actually g about?
Are you being sarcastic or can you really not tell the difference between those two sentences?
Bystander was a protestor.
Arturo was a protestor with a rifle, in the same area as bystander.
Bystander was shot.
https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news/salt-lake-city/peacekeeper-in-no-kings-protest-shooting-makes-first-court-appearance
A civilian volunteer that pledged not to have a gun. Shot another civilian who didn’t pledge to have a gun, for having a gun…
What does this have to do with law enforcement again?
Who is the cop that shot someone?
Are you aware that you are arguing in bad faith?