• [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can you admit that they are not starting out with their full 20% cut?

    That is the entire reason you cannot accept any explanations based on the reality that they have some wiggle room to increase profits.

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Again, I quoted you the exact figures that show year over year consistency with aligning to the range required by the law. Do you disagree with their findings?

        • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          The range I’m referring to is the MLR requirements under the ACA.

          It’s a range, because they must take on a minimum 80% MLR, but in some cases the law requires them to take an even higher MLR.

          • [deleted]@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, they are saying it doesn’t work the way you describe because the companies never actually reach their 20% cut. Rebates don’t cap their net revenue because they are never close to the cap.

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              No, they are saying it doesn’t work the way you describe because the companies never actually reach their 20% cut.

              Lol absolutely not. They said no such law exists that would require insurers to rebate customers. Again, unlike you I’m happy to quote anything you think wasn’t said.

              Rebates don’t cap their net revenue because they are never close to the cap.

              So you disagree with the findings I linked you?

              • [deleted]@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Your link explains how you are completely misunderstanding how everything works and explains the same things we telling you.

                Go read what you linked until it sinks in.

                • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Then tell me how the quote I gave you fails to align consistently with the range of MLR required by the law.