null

Me: posts direct quotes about waging a propaganda war

You: They never said they were going to wage a propaganda war.

Why are you just straight up lying?

Not sure why you would post the source and then lie about what it says:

• “Please try to keep the dirtbag lib-dunking to hexbear itself. Do not follow the Chapo Rules of Posting, instead try to engage utilizing informed rhetoric with sources to dismantle western propaganda. Posting the western atrocity propaganda and pig poop balls is hilarious but will pretty quickly get you banned and if enough of us do it defederated.”
• “The West’s role in the world, through organizations such as NATO, the IMF, and the World Bank - among many others - are deeply harmful to the billions of people living both inside and outside of their imperial core.”
• “These organizations constitute the modern imperial order, with the United States at its heart - we are not fooled by the term “rules-based international order.” It is in the Left’s interest for these organizations to be demolished. When and how this will occur, and what precisely comes after, is the cause of great debate and discussion on this site, but it is necessary for a better world.”

“I can assure you there will be no lemmygrad brigades, that energy would be better funneled into the current war against liberalism on the wider fediverse.”

“All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.”

At least you’re open about being a hypocrite though, when it comes to banning people for just “having stances”

Just be warned, Cowbee is very much misrepresenting things here.

I urge you to read the thread he linked, and not take his summary seriously.

If you’re really gonna say deliberately connecting to an instance with the stated goal of dismantling and inserting a communist ideology via a propaganda war is tantamount to “just having a stance” then it should be clear to everyone what a bad actor you are.

Imagine if I publicaly stated that the goal of my instance was to build a userbase, infiltrate .ml, dismantle communist ideology, and spread liberal propaganda. Are you really gonna pretend you’d leap to my defense when Dessalines obviously banned/defederated me?

Hell, he loves to abuse rule 2 to silence “Liberals” constantly. Yet you don’t seem to have anything to say about that…

Reading that thread, it’s clearly not for “having stances”. Very, very clearly it’s about their intention to push anti-liberal propaganda and dismantle liberalism across the fediverse.

Yours is a clearly disingenuous reading, and I hope people here aren’t just taking you at your word.

Probably should have said “looking at your phone” instead of “have your headphones on”.

Never had the opportunity, but I love me some nice, warm, tape saturation

Sound design, mixing, and mastering audio.

Please prove me wrong, I’m so lonely.

No you didn’t. You just made a completely irrelevant point about truth.

They just explained how to use AI in a way where “truth” isn’t relevant.

Why do you need someone else to plan it for you?

You are literally describing the slippery slope fallacy.

Moderation is not a step towards human rights violations. Get a grip.

Man, I wish there were consequences for them to dodge.

God that’s too real.

Feeling unaccomplished because instead of getting things done you felt like you were just fending things off.

Yeah, the right to exist and the right to participate in a Lemmy community are the same thing.

That’s funny, but I’ve actually heard that recommended professionally as a legitimate tactic.

You spent 18 years learning to navigate a gated world. You will do just as much learning in the next 18 navigating a newly ungated one.

Think about the sort of kindness you would want to treat a younger version of yourself as he fumbled through that learning. Practice treating your new “young” self with that kindness today. It will pay dividends.