• db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Couldn’t they make an argument with that pointing out that they’re being unjustly targeted because they’re smaller and easier to pick on?

      • SolacefromSilence@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No one cares if they’re small or unjustly picked on. If they want to beat the charges, they need to announce their own AI trained on the data.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It would make me laugh if they could train an LLM that could only regurgitate content verbatim

          • Dran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 minutes ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markov_chain

            Before the advent of AI, I wrote a slack bot called slackbutt that made Markov chains of random lengths between 2 and 4 out of the chat history of the channel. It was surprisingly coherent. Making an “llm” like that would be trivial.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Well, it’s not an LLM, but “AI” doesn’t have a defined meaning, so from that perspective they kind of already did.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          If they want to beat the charges, they need to announce their own AI trained on the data several billion in Series A investment funding.