• Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Well, I am pretty convinced most of the mentioned issues are actually intentional design choices.

    Google does want neither the users, nor the app owners to have the best experience, but to control their actions in a way that generates the most revenue for Google.
    Prime example for Enshitification.

    From Google’s point of view, it must not change any of the issues, as everything is working perfectly for them already.

    • cron@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      One thing that bothers me is the reviews. For some reason, those Google Play reviews are barely helpful at all.

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gamification of reviews is one of the biggest reasons for CI/CD existing. Releasing pointless version bumps with no code changes on most apps. The whole update psychology needs to change, in general.

  • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s funny how American oligarchs wax theatrical about “da AI revolution” and yet they can’t even solve basic issues in an application store or follow their own publishing guidelines (Twitter/Grok CSAM features).

    Bunch of liars and criminals.

    • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Step one: remove Android and install an open source OSp

      isn’t Android open source?

      Even if you have Lineage or Graphene, you may need to have access to boogle play store. In which case, a better advice would be to use Aurora instead

      • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Android is NOT open source. AOSP is, but the android distributions you get on a retail phone add proprietary and closed source features atop AOSP. It is at best open-core but even that is questionable given the release cadence of AOSP

        • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          you’re right. thanks for the precision

          At its core, the operating system is known as the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) and is free and open-source software (FOSS) primarily licensed under the Apache License. However, most devices run the proprietary Android version developed by Google, which ships with additional proprietary closed-source software pre-installed, most notably Google Mobile Services (GMS), which includes core apps such as Google Chrome, the digital distribution platform Google Play, and the associated Google Play Services development platform. Firebase Cloud Messaging is used for push notifications. While AOSP is free, the “Android” name and logo are trademarks of Google, who restrict the use of Android branding on “uncertified” products. The majority of smartphones based on AOSP run Google’s ecosystem—which is known simply as Android—some with vendor-customized user interfaces and software suites, for example One UI. Numerous modified distributions exist, which include competing Amazon Fire OS, community-developed LineageOS; the source code has also been used to develop a variety of Android distributions on a range of other devices, such as Android TV for televisions, Wear OS for wearables, and Meta Horizon OS for VR headsets.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)