The U.S. Supreme Court will hear Monsanto’s argument that federal pesticide law should shield it and parent company Bayer from tens of thousands of state lawsuits over Roundup since the Environmental Protection Agency has not required a cancer warning label. The case could determine whether federal rules preempt state failure-to-warn claims without deciding whether glyphosate causes cancer.
Just a reminder that Clarence Thomas is a former Monsanto lawyer and has never recused himself from a case involving them. Not that anyone actually thinks he has an iota of ethics anyways.
Lawsuits were the compromise. Guess we drag the fucks from their offices and homes and loot their belongings.
It’s Luigi time at Monsanto
Sounds good! I’ll go get the guillotine out of the back shed.
We ain’t French! Get a deep fryer!
Microwave with a hole in the front
Oh cool, sounds like Monsanto’s checks hit exactly 6 bank accounts last Friday.
Don’t forget Trump.
Whilst the headline correctly says “may”, let’s hope that this is more that they will consider the option of upholding the rights to allow damages payments.
