• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    There’s still Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. I’d vote for her in a heartbeat.

    I guess the only problem is that the US has proved themselves to still be a bit too sexist, with Clinton followed by Harris.

    Personally, I put that at the feet of conservative women. When Obama ran, the African American vote showed up, he got a lot of support from voters that often learned conservative. When women run, all too often it’s the female vote that doesn’t show up.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. Women who run for office win at similar rates as men. That doesn’t sound like a sexist electorate to me.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Why is a sexist electorate even hard to believe? Why is there even reason to doubt it? Hell, given the clear impact racism has had on our country these past few years, it seems awfully silly to write off sexism as a possibility. I mean, look around.

        • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Could very well be, but Hillary Clinton’s presidential run doesn’t provide evidence to that effect, since the majority of voters chose her.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            the majority of voters chose her.

            So what? The majority of people aren’t racists, that doesn’t mean that we don’t have racism. Sexism can exist and have measurable effects even if a female candidate gets more votes. The fact is, she didn’t get enough votes. That is in part because some voters wrote her off, believing a male candidate would be better because they were male. We know this is true because people have actually said that sex was a factor after casting their vote.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My problem is that AOC voted to stop the rail unions from striking. Funny how they can do so much nothing now, yet can flex so hard when a working class movement has momentum.

    • brooke592@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think AOC would be able to overcome the sexism because she actually cares about the working class, unlike the establishment plants that reinforce the notion that our government doesn’t serve us.

      • FE80@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Claiming “sexism” is how you obfuscate that the candidates were garbage people.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ouch… So then you must be of the opinion that Trump won the election on his merits?

          Perhaps it was his fiscal responsibility that won him the day?

          • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Dems lost in 2024 because Kamala Harris reached out to Republicans and ignored the left, and because the primary theme of her campaign was “Things are pretty good,” when things were not. Sexism was a very minor part of the end result.

            If we want people to vote for Democrats, we need better Democrats.