Nothing about the constitution enables the public to obstruct the duties of a police officer.
Infact The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.
Cox v. Louisiana (1965), 379 U.S. 536
Protestors blocked access to a courthouse and were arrested. The Supreme Court upheld the arrests.
If you want to protest the police you can do that. But you cannot protest the police by stalking and then spontaneously inhibiting their abilities to perform their job.
This is kind of a symantical useless statement. They police immigration law, they are officers of immigration law, but for some reason convenient for you, you don’t want them to be able to be called police officers.
It’s not what they’re called that makes the difference. It’s that they swear allegiance to the Constitution but are trampling on the whole Fourth Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
They also use administrative warrants, not judicial ones which have more power and proof has to be brought in front of a judge before it’s issued.
LICE is nothing but a gang of racist dumbfucks who think they’re gods.
It’s not what they’re called that makes the difference
Then stop asserting they’re not police officers like it means something, when you just acknowledged that it doesn’t.
It’s that they swear allegiance to the Constitution but are trampling on the whole Fourth Amendment
Yeah I don’t think they are, and in the situation where it’s borderline it’s due to to aggressive mobs obstructing them from their duties. Situations where there is actual constitutional violations should absolutely be handled in the court, not by flash mobs obstructing then from proceeding.
You don’t ‘think’ they are and that’s the problem. Look at the facts only and stop relying on what you ‘think’. 'Cause the facts show LICE is ignoring what the Constitution says is right.
Absolure brain rot from the left.
Nothing about the constitution enables the public to obstruct the duties of a police officer.
Infact The Supreme Court has already ruled on this.
Cox v. Louisiana (1965), 379 U.S. 536
Protestors blocked access to a courthouse and were arrested. The Supreme Court upheld the arrests.
If you want to protest the police you can do that. But you cannot protest the police by stalking and then spontaneously inhibiting their abilities to perform their job.
ICE aren’t police. Didn’t I already tell you that?
This is kind of a symantical useless statement. They police immigration law, they are officers of immigration law, but for some reason convenient for you, you don’t want them to be able to be called police officers.
Lying ICE (aka LICE for short) are NOT bona fide cops.
What is there about that you don’t seem to understand?
The relevance to the point you’re trying to make.
It’s not what they’re called that makes the difference. It’s that they swear allegiance to the Constitution but are trampling on the whole Fourth Amendment:
They also use administrative warrants, not judicial ones which have more power and proof has to be brought in front of a judge before it’s issued.
LICE is nothing but a gang of racist dumbfucks who think they’re gods.
Then stop asserting they’re not police officers like it means something, when you just acknowledged that it doesn’t.
Yeah I don’t think they are, and in the situation where it’s borderline it’s due to to aggressive mobs obstructing them from their duties. Situations where there is actual constitutional violations should absolutely be handled in the court, not by flash mobs obstructing then from proceeding.
You don’t ‘think’ they are and that’s the problem. Look at the facts only and stop relying on what you ‘think’. 'Cause the facts show LICE is ignoring what the Constitution says is right.