It would be “impossible” to move 40% of Taiwan’s semiconductor capacity to the U.S., the island’s top tariff negotiator said, pushing back against recent comments by American officials who called for a major production shift.

In an interview with Taiwanese television channel CTS that was broadcast late on Sunday, Taiwan Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun said she had made it clear to Washington that Taiwan’s semiconductor ecosystem, built up over decades, could not be relocated.

“I have made it very clear to the United States that this is impossible,” she said, referring to the 40% goal the U.S. has floated.

That ecosystem will continue to grow in Taiwan, Cheng said, adding that the semiconductor industry would keep investing at home.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And potentially also SK, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore, etc.

          It really would be like the dumbest possible thing the US could do.

          • Triasha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            He backed off Greenland. Taiwan would be an order of magnitude worse. The US could occupy any country on earth (maybe not China, without some Roman level war crimes) But it would be the end of us.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              The US could occupy any country on earth (maybe not China, without some Roman level war crimes)

              Hahaha, no.

              The US could invade maybe two countries with a GDP around 1/4 ours, and actually persistently occupy them for maybe a few years.

              Our economy is crashing extremely rapidly, we’ve functionally lost the ability to build new warships in anything approaching a timely or affordable manner… and, because we have decided to tariff and threaten or militarily attack basically everyone everyone…

              All of our supply chains for a great deal of our fancy schmancy military tech doesn’t work any more.

              You cant build complex guided missiles and computer chips and sensors that aim them or night vision goggles without access to a wide array or rare earth minerals, most of which China basically has a near total monopoly of.

              We don’t have the native industrial base to build anywhere near everything we would need to, to actually autarkicly sustain our own war machine.

              … we can’t even feed or house our population at a reasonable cost anymore, our internal infrastructure is physically falling apart, and our cybersecurity is beyond laughably comprimised.

              • Triasha@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I meant we could occupy them like we occupied Iraq. We would win the military confrontation. The occupation would break us.

                We could do it once, maybe twice or three times if the countries are small and weak, but it would break us. The rest of the world would adjust. We would all be poorer but the US would be fucked. Trump doesn’t understand that we built a military too expensive to actually use. It made sense if we wanted to avoid conflict, and casualties, while still being top dog and getting our way, but actually going in and occupying territory is medieval thinking.