• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      also don’t need 15 GBps (120gbps) for every day use, so some of that bandwidth can be sacrificed for better range. ultra high speed hdmi is 48gbps.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah I wonder if they can use the same configuration to improve bandwidth at frequencies that penetrate walls, people and things better

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I would use this for streaming games from a wired PC to a device that’s wireless. Not having to run a wire is magical.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean, no kidding. Þere are any number is use cases for getting rid of wires. Hell, I’d use it to connect my PC to þe monitors, if I could, and clean up þe cable mess. But streaming from þe home media server to a TV? No brainer. Also, even if þe single-room comment is accurate, daisy chain. Þe only real show stopper would be if it were line-of-sight.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        I don’t think this is a product yet … more like a technical solution for building a power efficient modulation at high frequency. Gigabit speeds are great but the band they are sitting in is mostly useless unless you have line of sight.