Order comes after seven people in California City facility allege they were denied medications, food and sanitation

The US government must provide detainees at a California immigration detention center with adequate medical care, access to attorneys, and “temperature-appropriate clothing and blankets”, a federal judge has ruled.

The order came on Tuesday in response to a lawsuit filed by seven people detained at the California City detention facility in November, alleging they had been denied essential medications, sufficient food and sanitary housing conditions.

Residents at the facility had previously described the center as a “torture chamber” and “hell on earth” in interviews with the Guardian.

    • silence7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s a court order. They treat those as optional because the courts aren’t willing to impose any meaningful penalty for noncompliance.

  • DABDA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Is breathable air also necessitated? Is there a minimum or maximum atmospheric pressure allowed in detention areas? Just how specific do the laws and orders need to be to prevent malicious compliance bullshit?

    “You never said the blankets couldn’t be made of steel wool and soaked in lemon juice.”
    “Temperature-appropriate clothing, sure - but you didn’t specify appropriate for the local climate and not somewhere thousands of miles away.”
    “The medication supply was adequate, it sufficed for the rest of their life!”

    There ain’t no rule that says a concentration camp can’t be made entirely of asbestos coated lead!

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The constitution is supposed to guarantee these things. That a court was required to order it? Fuck absolutely everything about this.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So you see: Don’t believe in the system
      to legalize you or give you your freedom
      You want rights? Ask ’em—they’ll read ’em
      But every flower got a right to be bloomin’
      Stay human

      — Michael Franti & Spearhead (2001)

    • forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes, but actually no.

      The bill of rights, i.e. first set of ammendments, are supposed to guarantee it. The framing of the original document did not include anything about our rights. Like - nothing at all what so fucking ever. Which kinda explains why those rights have been trampled all over by our own government so many times - they were an afterthought to market the main document to the masses.

  • tallarmoire@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We have Nazi America on the rise and people aren’t storming these concentration camps?

    This is gonna look bad in 100 years when they make movies