• sik0fewl@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Not even close.

    They’re suggesting that Canada won’t be able to defend its own airspace so US will have to be able to operate more freely in Canadian than they already do. They are saying that the NORAD agreement would need to be updated to accommodate this.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And neither Finland nor Sweden are at war with Russia despite it. Bullshit tactic used by fucking putin yes but act of war no.

        • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You seem to be applying a pretty strict definition to what is actually an arbitrary term. An act of war can be anything that any nation wants to call an act of war.

          So I guess we should probably just use some of the countries involved in the real life case we are talking about.

          Does anyone consider violation of airspace by a nations warplanes to be in-and-of-itself an act of war or at least a proactive action worthy of escalation and retaliation? Oh yeah, the United States does. And so does Russia.

        • Greddan@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Just because our politicians won’t accept it. We are currently at war with Russia. Have been for years. At least that’s what the Russians tell their own population. Then we have the constant sabotages in and around our territory by “totally not Russian military” people. When was the last time anyone formally “declared” a war? It isn’t the 1800s anymore.