muelltonne@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 hours agoIn a blind test, audiophiles couldn't tell the difference between audio signals sent through copper wire, a banana, or wet mudwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up1714arrow-down110
arrow-up1704arrow-down1external-linkIn a blind test, audiophiles couldn't tell the difference between audio signals sent through copper wire, a banana, or wet mudwww.tomshardware.commuelltonne@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 hours agomessage-square132fedilink
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 hours agoIf I read it correctly, it was analog and they found that only the signal amplitude was meaningfully changed, not the quality
minus-squareneidu3@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 hours agoMakes sense. As long as the transfer medium isn’t highly capacitive or inductive, it doesn’t matter as long as you compensate for the loss in signal strength. …and now I fell into a research rabbit hole regarding mud capacitance.
If I read it correctly, it was analog and they found that only the signal amplitude was meaningfully changed, not the quality
Makes sense. As long as the transfer medium isn’t highly capacitive or inductive, it doesn’t matter as long as you compensate for the loss in signal strength.
…and now I fell into a research rabbit hole regarding mud capacitance.