• Piatro@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    What business purpose does it serve to continually improve their product? Hmm. Gee. Hmmmmmmm. Geeeeeeeeee. I’m stumped.

      • Piatro@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Genuinely worried about that when Gabe passes the torch. I’m glad most of their Linux work is going back to the commons and to open source tools so even if they do become shit we’ll still have decent compatibility.

    • doublah@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Is this improving their product? These changes benefit users on non-Valve hardware playing any game on Linux (including non-Steam games). Like I’m glad Valve is funding talented free software developers to work on whatever they want but the benefit for Valve is very indirect.

      • Piatro@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yes it’s indirect, but remember that Microsoft is one of their biggest competitors. This isn’t about seeing absolute profit from every change, it’s about improving linux as a platform to make it more viable for consumers, which will make it more viable for developers, which pushes more people to Steam and SteamOS as their first Linux distro and first destination for games. By making the platform perform extremely well on older/cheaper hardware they also create a market for other businesses to create hardware (Legion Go for example) which will increase the PC market and increase the number of people using steam since it’s the defacto monopoly. Yes, they won’t necessarily get every penny from every sale of hardware or even games since other game stores exist, but they will get a huge percentage from the majority of people in the PC market.