• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It is statistically impossible for life to exist on exactly one planet in the universe. Earth just isn’t that fucking special!

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Yah, but it’s also statistically more likely that we have missed crossing paths with them or even seeing their signs by millions of light years, as well as millions of years of history.

      Entire empires could have risen to galactic power and ruled vast portions of the galaxy and finally splintered, evolved or gone extinct in just the million years before humans invented stone tools. Or some thousands of years during the Devonian period or something. Or the nearest planet with life is still just boneless fish and will need a hundred million more years to develop radio.

      We’re not only a microscopic dot in space, we’re also a microscopic dot in time. And our ability to even look out into space and detect anything is a tiny shaving of time off that dot.

      • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As far as the history of the universe is concerned we are actually super early on in its lifespan. So in some ways it’s actually more likely that we will be one of the early civilizations that perish before the others show up.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The problem is the human mind cannot understand the concept of how far one single light year is. Even Fermi struggled.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s also seemingly impossible for aliens to traverse dozens, if not hundreds or thousands of light years. Unless it’s in the solar system, which it’s not, it’s not actually possible. They could send a machine perhaps. Unless you believe in some type of warp speed, which I don’t.

      • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I personally don’t believe aliens have come to earth as I don’t have evidence. But I also don’t discount what can be done or us being able to figure out something warp-like.

        A lot of what we know about the universe now would have been impossible to fathom just 2/3 centuries ago. Do humans know how to get close to or exceed the speed of light right now? No.

        But there have been billions of years and probably countless possible civilizations that maybe could.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Those that claim to have all the answers to the universe are certainly mistaken and there is a lot more than we know I totally agree on that. At every point in human history experts have claimed to have all the answers, and have always been wrong, but we are to believe they are right this time?

          Not the least on the cosmos, we only see an infinitesimal part of a greater whole too, just a bacteria on a speck of dust in something we have no way of understanding. Part of wisdom is realizing what you do not, and cannot know, I have always thought.

          That said, I just don’t see warp speed as possible, maybe there is something that travels faster than the speed of light, and if that is the case, maybe that could be used. But I don’t think there are portals or bends in space time or whatever theories they are putting forward, any more than I believe time travel is possible.

    • lauha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Life is certain to exist, but multicellular life is less likely and intelligent multicellular who reaches for the stars is even less likely

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Who said anything about multicellularity, intelligence, or space travel?

        Point is, Obama’s answer was vacuously true, and the only answer a non-idiot could reasonably could have given.

        …Okay, I admit he could have quoted Contact for extra style points:

        “The universe is a pretty big place. If it’s just us, seems like an awful waste of space.”

        But aside from that, the answer he gave was the only one he could reasonably have given.

        • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.

          Arthur C. Clarke

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Okay wait, listen to yourself. You expected Obama to give a reasonable answer, and of course he did. Gosh, wasn’t that nice? You might agree or disagree with his choices and priorities, but even his worst policies had SOME sort of reason behind them. And were stated in complete grammatical sentences that stayed in topic.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Earth is special. More special than most of the other planets that exist. But it’s not the only special one.

      • Karjalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        More special than ones we’ve detected, but our detection methods have a very biased available dataset.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If we presume a functionally infinite universe sure life pretty much has to exist in multiple spots. That’s a big presumption by itself though.

      After that, is said civilization on some dinosaur shit? Are they so far beyond us we look like cavemen in comparison? Are they looking around the universe and just missed us? Do we want them to find us? Historically humanity finds less advanced groups and kills, enslaves, or just robs them blind. No reason to think the alien conquistadors would be better then the Spanish ones.

      • bufalo1973@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You are missing something: maybe the next “neighbor” civilization is in Andromeda or even farther. There is A LOT of space in the universe.

        • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I would be very surprised if it was that far away to be honest. They estimate there are likely trillions of planets in our own galaxy now. For us to be the only one would be absurdly unlikely.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      However, in the universe’s life of billions of years, many civilizations may have risen and fallen, just not at the same time. Maybe life is such a rare confluence of events, that it only springs up occasionally, and never at the same time.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Again, who said anything about “civilization?” Even just on Earth, life has existed for 4 billion years. That’s 4 billion of the 14 billion years the universe as a whole has existed, or 28% of the time, which I wouldn’t call “rare” at all!

        Life on Earth started damn near immediately as soon as the crust cooled enough to not set it on fire cook its proteins (it wouldn’t have caught fire becsuse the atmosphere didn’t have oxygen yet). Does that sound “rare” to you?

        • Klear@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Life on Earth started damn near immediately (in geologic terms) as soon as the crust cooled enough to not set it on fire cook its proteins (it wouldn’t have caught fire because the atmosphere didn’t have oxygen yet). Does that sound “rare” to you?

          Sounds well done to me.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Are “statistically impossible” and “extremely unlikely” not synonyms?

        • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No. Statistically impossible means that according to statistics it canNOT occur. Extremely unlikely means that in a given percentage of cases, it CAN occur.

        • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          No. “Impossible” is an absolute statement, whereas “extremely unlikely” leaves a non-zero chance for the unlikely thing to actually happen.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I didn’t say “impossible,” though. I said “statistically impossible.”

            • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Exactly. That’s why I corrected that it’s statistically extremely unlikely but not impossible.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It isn’t. Check out this talk by Dr. Kipping. If you role 1000 x D6, you might say it is statistically impossible to role that number. And you’d be close to right; it was very unlikely. But you did role it.

      • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Also, we just have literally no idea what it actually takes for life to come together. We have a sample size of one. Trying to come up with stats based on that is ridiculous, and until we actually come up with more evidence, saying either “oh there are definitely aliens” or “no there definitely aren’t” just proves to me a person’s willingness to make concrete statements on things they know nothing about.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          We do have an idea actually! We’ve run experiments where we put all the ingredients in a box and zap it, and we’ve found that it’s possible for them to start forming the compounds that form the base of life on earth.

        • bufalo1973@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          We are in a common planet, made with the most common elements in the universe, floating around a star of the most common type. I don’t think life is that special.

          • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            i didn’t say earth was special. do you know what it takes for those elements to come together in a way that even begins to approach life? do we ever get brand new single celled organisms that have no relation to anything that currently exists? why does every organism we’ve studied seem to descend from a single ancestor if it’s so easy for life to arise from a barren soup?

            we don’t even know if we arose from that soup. maybe we’re actually the aliens, delivered as a single frozen cell from some asteroid that crashed into earth. maybe! who knows! if people wanna write fanfic about the universe that’s their business, but it’s wildly frustrating how so many people pretend that fic has any scientific basis

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              why does every organism we’ve studied seem to descend from a single ancestor if it’s so easy for life to arise from a barren soup?

              That one was successful. A million others could easily have arisen before it but been unsuccessful. A million others could have arisen afterwards but failed to compete with that single ancestor. And it’s nearly impossible for them to leave any evidence of their existence.