Context: ~3.5yo Drupal / Prestashop / Plain PHP dev

I tried Cursor because our company paid for it, and it does bloody everything near instantly.

If I need to write a module for some custom data report UI, or a data importer of some variety, this thing just needs to know the detailed spec and it gets me probably 80% of the way to the feature in minutes. It’s ridiculous. The rest is just me picking some UI libraries, fixing bugs, and probably optimizing the code a bit.

I really don’t know what to do with the information that this thing can do what it took me so long to learn, in minutes, rather than hours, while I stumble around plugin declarations as if I just started to code.

Even the off-usage limit Cursor works really good. I can just keep coding with it past the $20 mark and it’s fine.

Of course the code it generates is pretty shit and full of comments…but it works.

I’ve integrated it into my work almost entirely along with the rest of the team. We all spam it daily. We pretty much never write a feature ourselves anymore. From what Cursor says, most of our code in GIT from the past few weeks is AI generated (like 70-80%…)

Before you say it, yes, our codebase is shit, and was shit. We have practically no devops, no real team structure, and something is always on fire, though I’m under the impression that this isn’t very uncommon nowadays… (For context, we just wrote our first documentation for a project more than 4 years old, and it’s all generated by Cursor, and there’s more hardcoded shit in our code than configurable stuff)

I keep trying to manually write code that I’m proud of, but I can’t. Everything always needs to be shipped fast and I need to move on to the next thing. I can’t even catch my breath. The only thing allowing me to keep up with the team is Cursor, because they all use it as well. The last guy that refused to use AI was just excluded from the team.

How the hell do I deal with this information? Where do I go from here? I’m fucking terrified and I need some advice from somebody that isn’t all up in the latest Opus model paying $80 (tax included) monthly to code with AI… I love my team, they’re great people, but our obsession with AI is REALLY concerning.

PS: If somehow I leaked who I work for somewhere and this can be crossreferenced to my company please let me know. I don’t want to be found talking about this, just because I don’t know how they would react, but I really need a different perspective.

EDIT: Thanks all for the responses. You’re confirming my fears. Idk how to feel about it…

  • Traister101@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Here. Read this https://flowchainsensei.wordpress.com/2026/02/04/the-software-quality-and-productivity-crisis-executives-wont-address/

    Executives aren’t ignorant. They have the data. They commission the surveys. They attend the conferences where CTOs present their concerns. They know that:

    • 91% of CTOs cite technical debt as the biggest challenge
    • 75% of projects are expected to fail
    • 69% of developers lose significant time to inefficiencies
    • Only 39% of projects meet success criteria
    • The recommended 15–20% investment in technical debt management yields better long-term returns than crisis spending

    Yet they choose:

    • Not to allocate recommended budgets for technical debt management
    • Not to make quality a strategic priority despite CTOs’ and developers’ concerns
    • Not to mention these challenges in public communications to shareholders
    • To celebrate AI productivity gains whilst developers report record inefficiency
    • To focus on the next hype cycle (AI) rather than address fundamental problems

    This isn’t a failure of knowledge. It looks to me like a failure of courage and integrity. A failure of the very concept of leadership.

    • foofiepie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I had a manager once threaten to fire me for even mentioning technical debt. He said the CTO was of the same view. I genuinely don’t understand why. It’s just denial. Thankfully both have moved on. Current manager doesn’t understand tech debt but doesn’t question the padding in the estimation.

    • rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Doing work is hard. AI is the perfect executive out for digging in and paying for actual people to fix actual things.

      Now instead of balancing teams and priorities, they can just demand “more AI” to “fix” any problem. Even when it fails, they told you to do the trendy thing that “works,” so their job is done. Continued failure is you problem, because they gave you the “resources you need. More AI.”