As I’m sure you’ve already memorized the community rules as if it was your moms birthday, I probably need not post it, but here is rule 6 anyway:

  1. No US Politics.

Please don’t post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online

I am writing this post in an effort to gather feedback on how the community feels about this rule. In short, keep it as it is, or revise it.

It is my personal belief that the main purpose it serves is to avoid the community from mainly revolving around what daft thing the orange lardsack last said or did. And while it serves that purpose well, I think it also inhibits some potential interesting topics.

For example, one possible revision could be to allow for questions regarding US politics, but with a requirement that the topic has to be regarding issues 25 years ago (that may or may not be relevant today).

Please let me hear your thunks.

  • dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    As a US citizen, keep the rule. As laid out in the text of the rule, there are already communities where questions of that nature can be asked.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think it’s a great rule!

    To me, the links to alternate communities are essential. They allow you to set restrictions while still maintaining a helpful atmosphere. Sometimes, people have legitimate, good-faith questions, and don’t know where to ask them. Those links help demonstrate a real concern for the users. Well done!

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 hours ago

    100% keen on keeping it. Expanding it to keep all political discussions out would be nice but I know that won’t happen.

    • pohart@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Expanding it to keep all political discussions out would be nice

      Not even possible. Every post would devolve into a discussion of what’s political.

  • Tywèle [she|her]@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Please keep it and I would even say to enforce it more strictly because I see so many question that I would categorize as US politics that are still allowed.

  • MuttMutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ll put it this way. I would prefer zero politics. If you allow them I’m gone.

    People who want to talk politics can easily create their own place to do so and nothing is preventing them from joining other places that are political discussion havens.

  • QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    PieFed has already implemented a feature which allows mods to move posts from one community to another. Lemmy and NodeBB are also working on this feature.

    Ideally we choose a community where these posts are moved to, that way any great discussions aren’t lost and they can carry on in the proper community.

    https://piefed.social/comment/9641830

  • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’d like to add this:

    If you are a chronic political poster, please think of yourself as someone who crates ads. We currently live in a world where ad creators think they have a god given right to shove ads into every square inch of our existence. And naturally, this is universally hated and people go to great lengths to block as many ads as they can because the ad makers won’t stop and think they have to do this.

    That’s you. You’re the ad maker. And that’s how you’re perceived.

    I know where I stand politically. I’ve known my entire adult life and I won’t be changing. I also know where to go to update myself on what’s going on politically, both locally and globally. I like having the option of going to it voluntarily and not having it imposed on me involuntarily. I like having the option of turning it off when I want/need to. I’d imagine a lot of people agree with that sentiment.

    That all being said, keep the rule. There are people who will still post political shit here because they can’t help themselves, regardless of what gets said in this thread.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s possible to imagine people having good questions about US politics, e.g. something like “I’m considering running for this public office in this state, what do I need to know about x?” but good luck crafting a rule that allows that and not the worthless noise.

  • disregardable@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It already gets political ?s even though it’s not supposed to. Taking out the rule just encourages even MORE of them.

  • bibbasa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    eyyyyy, shameless self-promo, but i made a community a couple days ago called !politicaloptimism@piefed.social

    i’m a little nervous about bringing this up since i’m the one of the only people active there right now, but we have a “Seeking Optimism” flair for people who are concerned about things happening and want assurance over the most sensational narratives over what’s happening.