• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    TeamSpeak only supports 32 simultaneous users, you must purchase a license to support more than that.

    • snoons@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, this bit was all I needei to know:

      Besides all of that, if you’d rather not chat to randoms who also happen to have an unhealthy obsession with Arc Raiders, you’ll likely need to pay an admittedly small subscription fee to rent your own ten-person community voice server. By that point, you’re handing over card details and essentially fulfilling an age assurance check anyway. If you’d rather limit how much info your chat platform of choice has about you, there are arguably better options out there.

          • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            For me, it wasn’t about the AI. It’s that early development of the game was all PvE play. PVP was something that was added at launch, and the game is tagged as PvE, along with PvP on steam. Stupid me thought there would be PvE only lobbies and I was clearly mistaken. I tried playing it, I put 100 hours in. The entire game was me grinding the easy map, to level up and craft/buy better guns, only to be shot on sight by someone and have everything I worked for taken. I would solo down bastions, leapers, and bombdiers to have someone run up and shoot me on site, without asking if I would share loot. (I would rather share than lose everything.) Events in the game also reward PvP play by awarding cred. People are making smurf accounts so they can end up in friendly matches to dominate people that don’t want to pvp. Enemy spawns are fucked up too. I’ve downed arc only for the corpses to despawn as I attempt to loot it. I’ve walked into clear areas, only to have bombadiers spawn on top of me out of nowhere. The worst part of the game is being dropped into a map/match after 10 minutes has elapsed, which means anything decent has already been looted and you’re more likely to run into people camping extraction points. They have a temp event running that rewards PvE cooperative play, and I’ve still gotten killed on site, although less frequently. After the event is over, I’ll probably uninstall the game again.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        How does CC details qualify as age verification? It’s WAY better than gov ID or face scan.

        I just mean this type of business model is ripe for enshittification.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Face scan is actually much easier to defeat than CC details.

          Nowadays with VISA ‘3D Secure’ and the equivalent on Mastercard you have to validate your legal name attached to the credit card, this is done via third-party which can request details your bank has on file (often your home address or mobile number), and even while those details are not supposed to be shared with the merchant (we know how careful banks are about keeping control of PII), the core detail - your legal name, is confirmed. It is not hard to tie a user to other data via data brokers once you have their legal name, and credit card number, and any other details they may share with the service (email, phone, etc).

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Face scan is actually much easier to defeat than CC details.

            I don’t understand. You don’t need to “defeat” CC details.

            They do not contain your age or your govt documents. Even if they did, a child is likely just going to use their parents’ CC. So it’s not a form of age verification at all.

            • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 hours ago

              In context, defeating the privacy exposure of requiring to use CC details would be buy getting an a anonymous credit card, which in most countries are now either very difficult to obtain or simply no longer offered (outlawed).

              Hope that helps.

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              It is the same effectiveness of scanning an ID since that could also be their parent’s.

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                The point of scanning the ID is (supposedly) to verify the age of the user, not their parents.

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Using a credit card or an ID are both just using a physical item to ‘verify’ an age of someone who may or may not be that person. Getting a credit card has a minimum age, so the end goal of age ‘verification’ is met either way although the ID has way more personally identifiable information like skin color, actual birth date, gender, etc.

                  It isn’t like scanning an ID verifies that the person scanning the ID is the person on the computer.

                  • artyom@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    Getting a credit card has a minimum age

                    Not true, anyone can become a “verified user” on another’s account. That’s what my parents did when I was a kid.

      • UnpledgedCatnapTipper@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Correct. 32 people connected to voice simultaneously, but there isn’t persistent text chat. So really, only 32 users at a time, at all. The lack of text made me set up a Matrix homeserver instead.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I don’t know. They call them “slots” without elaborating and tell you to contact them for more details.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        For anything, is my understanding. If they try to open it, they’re just represented with a “server full” notification.