• UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remember when narrow viewing angles of an LCD screen would cost you ratings on a review. Good move marketing it as a “feature”.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah but it’s toggleable. That makes all the difference.

      I think it uses the same tech as the 3DS did, only in an implementation that doesn’t give you a migraine after 30 seconds.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Businesses buy IPS displays for decades now, the tech that trades colors and contrast for a wider viewing angle. Then they slap a prism foil on top, to reduce the viewing angle (but also colors and contrast).

      I mean, buy a TN or VA instead? They are even cheaper.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you can toggle it, it’s definitely a feature worth praising, I’d say.

      (And as a warning to all those spicy novel readers out there: An LCD from a bad viewing angle will still often show what you’re looking at, but inverted.)

    • Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This isn’t really showing what the display is like. It apparently can adjust viewing angle on a per-pixel level, so for example only apps and notifications you set will have limited viewing angles.

      Here’s a story with a better leaked visual: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S26-Ultra-display-may-have-more-tricks-up-its-sleeve.1214117.0.html

      Frankly I think it’s still a bit gimmicky for privacy (why not just do the full screen, which you can do with a $10 polarized screen protector to all phones already), but it’s legitimately neat tech.