• ozymandias117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The moving parts are in the device rather than the cable with Lightning. The tongue on USB-C is required to be deep enough that you can’t torque it with the cable during insertion/removal.

    It’s not an obvious comparison, but the mechanical engineers where I work seem to have a mild preference for USB-C

    The expensive part of both is that you need a microcontroller in the cable

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      By ‘moving parts’ you mean the springed contacts? Yeah wow, that’s a lot of movement.

      USB-C has more pins because it was made later and is required to carry standards like Displayport and Thunderbolt. If Apple made Lightning 2, nothing prevents them from slapping more contacts on it.