Senate Bill 26-051 reflects that pattern. The bill does not directly regulate individual websites that publish adult or otherwise restricted content. Instead, it shifts responsibility to operating system providers and app distribution infrastructure.

Under the bill, an operating system provider would be required to collect a user’s date of birth or age information when an account is established. The provider would then generate an age bracket signal and make that signal available to developers through an application programming interface when an app is downloaded or accessed through a covered application store.

App developers, in turn, would be required to request and use that age bracket signal.

Rather than mandating that every website perform its own age verification check, the bill attempts to embed age attestation within the operating system account layer and have that classification flow through app store ecosystems.

The measure represents the latest iteration in a series of Colorado efforts that have struggled to balance child safety, privacy, feasibility and constitutional limits.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Linux won’t be legal in Colorado if they pass this. You’ll need an account with some age-policing corporation to be able to use a computing device.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The courts should strike it down, I don’t have faith they will side with the constitution, but it’s clearly unconstititional and beyond the authority of the state as well, in the realm of interstate commerce which is explicitly given to the feds, whom can’t be trusted either obviously.

        But the 1st amendment is clearly invalidating this, forcing people to identify themselves to groups that will record everything they say or do and sell it to everyone, including the government, that will chill speech, and groups will punish people for their speech.

        Too bad scotus is all in on punishing people for speech though.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Presumably quite selectively, based on the user’s political leanings.

        Not defend Democrats too much here, but they clearly have far less of a habit of doing this than the Republicans, even if they do enforce things quite selectively when it comes to actual leftists while letting Nazis run around with seeming impunity.

        Colorado has been a solidly Blue state since the W. Bush years, and even then, it was pretty split down the middle with just over half going to Bush.

        Further, the two main sponsors of the bill are both Democrats.

        Once again, not saying Democrats aren’t guilty of selective enforcement, just pointing out that they’re far less likely to do so (or at least less likely to do so against conservatives, for genuine leftists it seems up for debate).

        Now, that also means nothing in context to how other politicians can use this kind of legislation negatively, even if the writers and sponsors truly have the best of intentions. Democrats had the best intentions when it came to the PATRIOT Act and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security as well, and way back then folks like me were saying “this seems pretty dangerous, especially if we ever have a despot take control of the country and the levers for these tools” which clearly has come to pass.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Democrats had the best intentions when it came to the PATRIOT Act and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security as well,

          How do you know what their intentions were?

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Well, not all of them, obviously. Yet, for example, I tend to think Joe Biden actually did have good intentions considering the bulk of the PATRIOT Act was based on his prior legislation in the 90s, his Omnibus Counterterrorism Act.

            People who were more clearly war hawks like Hillary Clinton? Probably a lot less likely to have had great intentions.

            Yet others, like Ron Wyden, who has been a consistent critic of the out of control national security state and voted against military intervention in Iraq in 2002 also voted for the PATRIOT Act. He also spent a great deal of time trying to amend the PATRIOT Act as well.

            • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              The left was saying that the PATRIOT Act was a bad idea from day one, just like we were with the Iraq War. People keep ignoring the left (or dismiss us as paranoid) and we keep getting proven right over and over and over again.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                No shit, I was one of those people. I just don’t ascribe to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity, being out of touch, and not thinking through long-term political consequences. Once again, the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act was largely in response to white nationalist home-grown terrorism, which not having squashed that in the 90s is literally part of why we have the problems we have to day with a white nationalist government.

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Are they going to check people’s PCs at the state borders as they move in then?

      • dustycups@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        What is in the actual bill? I haven’t read any of this but if it was just a year of birth box at local signup then this could actually be pretty good. A sort of halfway between local only parental controls & age-policing, ID-reporting corporations.

    • imrighthere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Not really, the microsoft asshole that coded systemd wants chips on hardware for linux just like 10/11. He’s going to help fuck linux the same way they fucked windows.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Bro he worked for Microsoft for four years after working for Red Hat for fourteen and then left to create Amutable, and no offense, but I don’t see his goals for Amutable to be about trying to force everyone to use his solution as much as giving groups who use massive numbers of Linux servers an option for something they can more securely lock down and ensure hasn’t been fucked with.

        This is just FUD fearmongering, especially considering how small the company is. He isn’t forcing the entire ecosystem to adopt his ideas.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            42
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Dude, Poettering is literally Guatemalan by birth, grew up in Brazil, and lives in Germany. Amutable is based out of fucking Berlin!

            Stop reaching.

            “Guys will do literally anything but go to therapy use systemd.”

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Show me who on the board of Amutable is who he is “working” for, since he’s one of the founders, and most of the people involved are European, or show me the funding for Amutable that’s coming from these “pedomericans” you claim or seriously shut the fuck up.

                You don’t have to like or use the tools these people create. Are you forced to use systemd? No, there are alternatives.

              • scintilla@crust.piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Dude you sound like a Republican talking about china being behind everything. It’s time to fucking reassess and touch some fucking grass.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You might need help. If you’re unwilling to seek help, then at least learn to code and, you know, read the code.