• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think votes should honestly be a bit more like old school SlashDot voting, where you had several different types of votes you could leave on a comment like Insightful, Funny, Helpful, etc. Have a few negative ones like Bad Faith Argument, Spam, Advertisement, etc. And also like old school /., you’d have a limited amount of votes you can give. Make them replenish once per day, or have users earn additional votes for receiving positive votes on their comments, or something along those lines.

    That would prevent bombing an entire comment thread with downvotes, and provides much-needed context for any given comment’s score.

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hard agree on the first part, hard disagree on the second part. Making the system into any sort of rewards system with counterbalancing not only makes the overall system tastier to exploit for Fake Internet Points, but also makes migrating less sellable to new users because their ability or value to interact is reduced or even nullified for a non-deterministic amount of time.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      or have users earn additional votes for receiving positive votes on their comments

      I found the slashdot system worse than the reddit/lemmy system, if you commented anything that offended the hive mind you got downvoted into oblivion and lost the ability to vote, which obviously ended up reinforcing the hive mind.

      • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I suppose you mean the limitations per diem on voting is what encouraged the hive mind, but even without those limitations Reddit and Lemmy have developed hive minds of their own, with similarly SOHC behaviors.

    • lath@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Piefed has some comment emojis available. Not sure how they show up on other instances.

      I used a "no smoking’ one on your comment. But did i use it properly or just to screw around?

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        On Mbin, it shows as just a regular upvote. Emoji votes would also be a great change, too! I like the way Misskey-like instances use them.

        • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I wish Mbin had even a fraction of the childlike whimsy that Misskey has.

          I also miss old school PHP bulletin board systems, which had similar emoji style votes where each one had different meanings, probably similar to what the op was talking about.

    • captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I would give you an Insightful vote but I don’t have any left. /s

      Jokes aside, I like both limiting number of votes per day (or otherwise) and having different kinds of votes. The reason why something is up/down voted can make for a better discussion. But I am agnositc towards renewing votes bases on engagement. On one hand, it would increase engagement, and on the other hand, it could scare lurkers away from otherwise upvoting good content.

    • Blaze@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This shows up regularly. It would definitely be an improvement over the current binary system.

      Piefed already has the emoji reactions, so that’s a step in that direction

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      This! Lemmy/Piefed needs metamoderation.

      The fact that scores were bounded to a predefined range ([-1, 5]) helped a lot, too.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, I haven’t seen that anywhere else. I also liked that each user had a limited amount of votes to cast and thus would (presumably) spend them wisely.

      Source: Excellent slashdot karma from when the site was good.