• MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any discussion of the open acceptance of Nazis into the GOP that doesn’t mention gamergate is, at best, incomplete.

    The fact that a central part of <gestures vaguely at everything> was some guy making up stories about his ex cheating on him is fucking wild.

      • MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure. Not trying to say otherwise, but they were at least largely quiet about it, they used euphemisms

        It’s the whole “you can’t say n* n* n*” speech from Lee Atwater.

        • squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree with you and the lineage is obvious when looking at how Steve Bannon pushed GamerGate at Breitbart and then went straight on to become Trump’s campaign manager.

          And Bannon’s name missing from that article is one of the article’s major flaws, considering how much Bannon shaped the MAGA movement as a whole.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      So what is this gamergate thing then? I know the gaming communities can be toxic to say the least. That they were a lot of the alt right that propelled the president to his first election win, only possible though because the democrats threw the election with the most unlikable candidate they could find to repudiate their base and embrace monied interests they are supposed to be the ones to oppose.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Back in the day (90’s-early 2000’s) it was hard to see how the right would ever really appeal to the younger generation (people were less politically engaged in general). There was no "alt-"right, just the traditionalists and Christian fundamentalists screaming about how Dungeons and Dragons is Satanic and shit like that. Those guys were incredibly lame, and very out of line with the sentiment of young people at that time, which was generally a kind of “free speech absolutism,” brought on by being the first generation with access to the internet. Shock images/videos were common and being able to handle that sort of thing was a point of pride. Pretenses of respect and decorum were stripped away in favor of the raw and unfiltered.

        Gamergate was the moment when this energy really began directing itself against left/liberal/minority figures, and took on a more explicitly political character. Because sometimes those people would critique video games and commit the cardinal sin of caring about things, while also sometimes disparaging things that people liked. Certain women became targets of hate in certain communities, and it wasn’t long before rumors started circulating that a female game developer (who was frequent target of hate) got favorable reviews because she was sleeping with the reviewers. Thus the famous line, “It’s not about misogyny, it’s about ethics in games journalism.”

        As liberals and leftists were not really on board with all the harassment campaigns and violent threats, and they faced more and more criticism from that direction, and they eventually formed into (or at least formed a key component of) this “alt-right” movement that rejected the pearl-clutching and feigned piety of the traditionalist right, while still hating minorities and progressives and all that.

        • MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Apropos of nothing, apparently there’s an email in the Epstein files referencing a conversation between Epstein and Moot (Admin of 4chan) convincing him to allow/create the pol board (where a lot of both the culture and organization behind gamergate originated)