• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Curious about the sourcing on number 8 there. The Wikipedia article on his removal states that the US supported the results of the election and condemned his removal and the coup overall. Once Zelaya was removed, Secretary of State Clinton tried to capitalize on the situation to strengthen Homduras’ dependency on US aid. I’d say that falls in a morally gray area, but it’s a far cry from an actual US backed coup.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Honduran_coup_d'état

    NGL, I originally started looking into this infographic because basically every one of those incidents involves a Republican administration except that one.

    • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      basically every one of those incidents involves a Republican administration

      Using military money that was allocated in the preceding year by democrats.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Okay? The problems highlighted in the infographic have nothing to do with how much military spending was approved, and everything to do with when and more specifically, where it was used.

        Would you be mad at republicans for approving more social service funding if Biden spent that money giving bailouts to corporations for “daycare”? (Purely hypothetical situation here)

        • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          So what are you saying? That American Imperialism is not the fault of America, but the fault of Republicans? Quite a convenient way to absolve yourself.

          My main point is that American Imperialism, especially in Latin America, enjoys bipartisan support.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 hours ago

            My main point is that historically, there has been one particular political group in the United States which consistently does the worst shit possible to the rest of the world. Not saying they’ve never done anything good, not saying that they are the only group that has ever done bad shit. I am saying that it’s a pretty big stretch to say “both sides are the same, just look at this map” and then have 11 of the 12 listed examples being perpetrated by one group, and the 1 example by the other group is disinfo/misinfo. I think it brings serious question into the validity of saying “both sides are the same” and the validity of the document overall.

            Also, map was hard to read at a glance, when I said #8, I was referring to Honduras. I thought the numbers were a key of some sort, not a count of military interventions.