Donald Trump is considering a possible executive order that would require banks to make sure customers are U.S. citizens to create or keep their accounts, according to a new report.

The proposed action, reported byThe Wall Street Journal, would see banks collect information on individuals’ citizenship through requests for a new category of documents in order to open the accounts.

The Independent has contacted the White House for confirmation or further information about reports of the executive order, which has reportedly raised eyebrows among some banks in recent days.

  • MediumSizedSnack@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s long past time to kill executive orders. Even the times they are used for good, they are often legally dubious and live on the whims of the courts.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You can’t really kill them. Technically it’s just the President saying do X or Y.

      On their own, they have no effect in law.

      They only instruct the Executive Branch on how to operate WITHIN existing law.

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They need to go back to what they were originally intended to be. It wasn’t supposed to be a way to enact new laws, it was meant to give agencies direction on how to go about enacting and enforcing laws passed by congress.

      The whole system is broken and corrupt though. So no simple fixes for any of the issues unless you consider tear it all down and start fresh as simple.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It wasn’t supposed to be a way to enact new laws, it was meant to give agencies direction on how to go about enacting and enforcing laws passed by congress.

        EOs should be considered dead on arrival and unenforceable unless they begin and end by listing which laws passed by Congress they’re meant to enforce and enact.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The regime actually does this, sometimes, like with the illegal tariffs. They site the law they pretend lets them do what they want to do, even when it really doesn’t.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The problem isn’t citations, it’s the legislative branch and the courts not doing their duty of oversight.