Pretty wild! All states give you at least 30 days to dump your baby, no strings attached. Some states give you 60 days!

I feel like more people should know about this! It seems like a highly under utilized ability.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I thought you had to fill out a form or identify yourself or they’d do DNA on the baby to identify you. But this says parents can remain nameless. I’m not sure what that entails.

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah from what I understand you can pull up, say the magic words, give no documentation of any type, then leave without the baby

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A while back I fell into the rabbit hole of people dropping off the baby without informing the other parent. turns out it’s really hard to get the kid back

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Omg, that is insane! Imagine coming home from work like

      “Honey, I dropped the baby off at the fire station today and the fireman yelled ‘BACK BACK NO TRADE BACK’ when I handed it over, so I’m pretty sure the decision is final. I hope you weren’t too attached to the babe.”

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yeah this directly came out of people abandoning babies in all sorts of place. Some places have these nest type of boxes all padded and temperature controlled where people can leave babies. This is the type of good thing I could see today republicans rallying to stop.

  • mvilain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s better than leaving them in some men’s room baby changing station with the sign “Place sacrifice here” sign taped to it.

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Better for most, but the rest area demon who is sustained on changing station sacrifices really hates this law.

  • hexdream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You know, a flight from overseas is expensive to do this, but you got to look at the long term savings…

      • hexdream@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Who knows where it would be deported. Would they get to you, in time to make sure its going to the right place? Give clothing branding the wrong country. Hell, ice may deport you before they know.anything about a baby

    • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It starts solid, but then there liquid, gaseous…. Scientists will need to help me with the 47 others here…

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The US is simply where the highest number of anglophones reside. You’d have to sum up the next three nations to get more English speakers than the US (according to world atlas.com).

        Assuming an English speaker on the internet is American is still rude, but not exactly a bad guess - and hardly chauvinism imo

        • darklamer@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Around 1½ billion people in the world know English, less than ¼ of them live in the US.

          • brown567@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I’d bet about 10% of them live in India alone! It’s been my experience that when people think about the global populace as a whole they don’t give India nearly as much weight as it warrants XD

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Don’t do numbers at me, if a quarter of the roulette wheel says USA we both know where you’re putting your money.

            Again, nobody said it was clean thinking or appropriate to pre-judge, only that you can easily see how the mistake gets made without ever calling it chauvinism.

            • darklamer@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              […], only that you can easily see how the mistake gets made without ever calling it chauvinism.

              This is the point where I strongly disagree with you, constantly mistaking less than ¼ for being the most likely is not easily made, there’s a good reason for why the expression US Defaultism exists, because a particular mindset is required for such a mistake to be easily made.

              • village604@adultswim.fan
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                ~25% is a lot when you’re talking about demographics that large. The US has more English speakers than the next two countries combined. If you’re looking at native English speakers, it’s about 63%.

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Anglophone is an incorrect metric.

          There are more non native English speakers than native English speakers.

          On English websites and communities there is no difference between those two as long as the website or community is not specifically for that purpose.

          Most people on Lemmy do not live in the US.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Again, and I’ve tried to be very clear about this, I’m not saying they’re correct. We agree that it’s a mistake. I’m explaining how it is an easy mistake to make.

            This is a frustrating conversation.

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s clear if you click the link - the article will tell you if your inference skills fail you!

    • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m more concerned how he had ten kids and then felt overwhelmed when his wife left him. Like what the fuck?!

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And I’ve not met many men with 10 kids who are super into doing the whole “dividing the labor of parenting evenly” thing, and I went to catholic schools, I knew some big families. And even if he had been the type to do that, you aren’t winding up being the breadwinner for a family with 10 kids and having both low stress finances and a low stress job. So adding in lots of extra home duties and possibly reduced financial capabilities and mourning will probably wreck you.

          That said, I’ve never met a family that large where the parents kept actually parenting beyond number 3 or 4. Some of the most horrifically parentified people I ever met were middle daughters of large families. Also the kids are struggling too, and each of them is likely to have taken some lasting psychic damage from being abandoned by their dad, even temporarily, shortly after their mom died.

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              6 hours ago

              As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed.

              But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he’s a man. Have fun with that.

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably

                  Would you have assumed the sameblack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids?

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “I think there’s a misperception that we just inadvertently left an age cap out. But the reality was we wanted to save lives of older kids who might be at risk,” said Amanda McGill Johnson, a Nebraska state senator at the time.

      That actually kind of makes sense? I mean, dropping off teens is excessive, but maybe it highlights an issue? Overwhelmed parents of teenagers isn’t something I had on my list of people that need more help, at least.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That is surprisingly kind for a Nebraskan legislator. Isn’t NE one of the states where they’d rather let women die than abort a fetus?

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          No, they’d rather let the mother die and get a free child prostitute out of it than to abort a fetus.

    • B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I guess it highlights why there should be no age limit… the response to introduce an age limit of 30 days certainly is not the right one.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    TIL people in USA still use insular leading language ignorant to the >200 states in the world. ;D

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I suppose adding “US” before “states” would have been a more inclusive language choice, but I was going for conciseness over inclusivity I guess. Using context, I feel that the meaning of my title is still clear.

      I do however apologize to anyone that may be offended by my language choice!

    • wer2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Just wait till you hear about how they call cities and towns in other countries “settlements” to make you care less about them being destroyed. Even when those places are older than the USA.

        • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          All over every piece of corporate owned media, lately especially re: Gaza and especially from NYT/BBC? Same deal as calling the kids in the Epstein files “underage women” and raping them sex. Doesn’t “clearing a settlement” sound better than “destroying a city”? It’s kinda disappointing you haven’t developed at least this much awareness of media biases by now, hate to imagine what the LLMs are imprinting on that preciously smooth brain :(

            • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Brother I gave you two specific examples and a more general overview, if you need more “here comes the airplane” than that I suggest seeing if your mother has enough patience left to deal with you

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Most fire stations in the US have at least one person trained as a paramedic/EMT and in many places all of them have at least some medical training. Because in a lot of places fire trucks arrive, there’s people who need immediate medical help.

    So they have the basic skills to keep a newborn baby alive until they can get it to a hospital. And if it’s older and healthy, they can just play with it and feed it and clean it as needed until Child Services arrives or it grows up and joins the crew.