• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Fun spin to put on “Epstein didn’t kill himself” but also, you know, come on.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      28 days ago

      Yes. Come on. Read. Watch. Investigate.

      Did you look up anything I just typed or oh, no, you just hit reply and assumed you already know everything you need to? Don’t fret, I’ll edit in links after lunch for the lazy.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        “None of the photos of him dead look dead” isn’t a great choice as your very first point if you’re trying to make a compelling argument.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            O…kay, you got any sources with even a shred of credibility? Because those are links to two random entertainers on youtube, a substack article (yay, nazi news platforms!) and an article that claims to have accessed epstein’s FedEx account but doesn’t provide even a screenshot as evidence.

            • Taldan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              While his sources lack credibility, dismissing every substack as a “nazi news platform” is disingenuous

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 days ago

                No, not really. Substack is a blog hosting platform that pays it’s subscribers - including straight up nazis. While there may be individual substack blogs with journalistic value (although I have never personally seen one that has it) the platform itself is a problem, and much as with twitter, it is perfectly reasonable for me to be skeptical of the people that choose to remain on it.

            • redsand@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              27 days ago

              I’m not chatGPT, I’m not going to do your work for you for free. Those videos show you URLs in the files or… Who am I kidding, you aren’t going to do leg work, you’re so incredibly intellectually lazy as to write off all of substack and YouTube. GL skid

              • Taldan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                27 days ago

                The only links in the descriptions for those videos are for Dr. G’s course, which isn’t a good look

                • redsand@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Yeah lazy YouTube descriptions suck but the note in his cell is way too much work to parse and he did a good job. Especially with some of that handwriting. Very much worth watching if you’re good at deciphering bad handwriting.

                  Guard transcripts don’t need the video you can read those.